[1] Conradie N, Kempt H, Königs P. Introduction to the topical collection on AI and responsibility. Philos Technol. 2022;35(4):97.
[2] Helo P, Hao Y. Artificial intelligence in operations management and supply chain management: An exploratory case study. Prod Plan Control. 2022;33(16):1573-1590.
[3] Agrawal A, McHale J, Oettl A. Finding needles in haystacks: Artificial intelligence and recombinant growth. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, editors. The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2018. p. 149-174.
[4] Tong S, Jia N, Luo X, Fang Z. The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strateg Manag J. 2021;42(9):1600-1631.
[5] Minbaeva D. Disrupted HR? Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2021;31(4):100820.
[6] Vrontis D, Christofi M, Pereira V, Tarba S, Makrides A, Trichina E. Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review. Artificial intelligence and international HRM. 2023;172-201.
[7] Beane M. Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Adm Sci Q. 2019;64(1):87-123.
[8] Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M. Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ Sci. 2020;31(5):1248–1271.
[9] Xie X, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang X, Zou J, Fontes-Garfias CR, et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike 69/70 deletion, E484K and N501Y variants by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):620-621.
[10] Tambe P, Cappelli P, Yakubovich V. Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. Calif Manag Rev. 2019;61(4):15–42.
[11] Baum K, Mantel S, Schmidt, Speith T. From responsibility to reason-giving explainable artificial intelligence. Philos Technol. 2022;35(1):12.
[12] Fuchs DJ. The dangers of human-like bias in machine-learning algorithms. Missouri S&T’s Peer to Peer. 2018;2(1). Available from: https://scholarsmine.mst
[13] Constantinescu M, Voinea C, Uszkai R, Vică C. Understanding responsibility in Responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context. Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23:803-814.
[14] Cheng MM, Hackett RD. A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2021;31(1).
[15] Köchling A, Wehner M. Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Bus Res. 2020;13(3):795-848.
[16] Kim PT, Bodie MT. Artificial intelligence and the challenges of workplace discrimination and privacy. ABAJ Lab & Emp L. 2020;35:289.
[17] Weston M, Sun H, Herman GL, Benotman H, Alawini A. Echelon: An AI tool for clustering student-written SQL queries. In: 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); 2021 Oct; IEEE. p. 1-8.
[18] Jeffrey D. Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. 2018. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G
[19] Charlwood A, Guenole N. Can HR adapt to the paradoxes of artificial intelligence? Hum Resour Manag J. 2022;32(4):729-742.
[20] Hedlund M, Persson E. Expert responsibility in AI development. AI & Soc. 2022;1-12.
[21] Wang H, Fu T, Du Y, Gao W, Huang K, Liu Z, et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023;620(7972):47-60.
[22] Mikalef P, Conboy K, Lundström JE, Popovič A. Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI. Eur J Inf Syst. 2022;31(3):257-268.
[23] Davenport A, Gefflot C, Beck C. Slack-based techniques for robust schedules. In: Sixth European conference on planning; 2014 May.
[24] Hakli R, Mäkelä P. Moral responsibility of robots and hybrid agents. The Monist. 2019;102(2):259-275.
[25] Loh F, Loh J. Autonomy and Responsibility in Hybrid Systems. In: Lin P, Abney K, Jenkins R, editors. Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 35–50.
[26] Goyal A, Aneja R. Artificial intelligence and income inequality: Do technological changes and worker's position matter? Public Affairs. 2020;20(4):e2326.
[27] Servoz M. AI, the future of work? Work of the future! On how artificial intelligence, robotics and automation are transforming jobs and the economy in Europe. Publications Office; 2019.
[28] Barredo-Arrieta A, Del Ser J. Plausible counterfactuals: Auditing deep learning classifiers with realistic adversarial examples. In: 2020 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN); 2020 Jul. p. 1-7. IEEE.
[29] Fjeld J, Achten N, Hilligoss H, Nagy A, Srikumar M. Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication. 2020;(2020-1).
[30] Wiggers G, Verberne S, van Loon WS, Zwenne G. Bibliometric-enhanced legal information retrieval: combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance. [Journal name missing]. 2023;(8):1010-1025.
[31] Jeffrey T. Understanding college student perceptions of artificial intelligence. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. 2020;18(2):8-13.
[32] Osoba O, Welser IV W. An intelligence in our image. Santa Mônica: RAND Corporation; 2017.
[33] Rana NP, Chatterjee S, Dwivedi YK, Akter S. Understanding dark side of artificial intelligence (AI) integrated business analytics: assessing firm’s operational inefficiency and competitiveness. Eur J Inf Syst. 2022;31(3):364-387.
[34] Desouza KC, Dawson GS, Chenok D. Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector. Bus Horiz. 2020;63(2):205–213.
[35] Agustono DO, Nugroho R, Fianto AYA. Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management Practices. KnE Soc Sci. 2023;958-970.
[36] Bankins S. The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision-making framework. Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(4):841-854.
[37] Delecraz S, Eltarr L, Becuwe M, Bouxin H, Boutin N, Oullier O. Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Technology: An innovative inclusive and fair by design matching algorithm for job recruitment purposes. J Responsible Technol. 2022;11:100041.
[38] Bankins S, Formosa P, Griep Y, Richards D. AI decision making with dignity? Contrasting workers’ justice perceptions of human and AI decision making in a human resource management context. Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(3):857-875.
[39] Sargiotis D. Harnessing Digital Twins in Construction: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices, Benefits, and Future Prospects. 2024.
[40] Chang YL, Ke J. Socially responsible artificial intelligence empowered people analytics: a novel framework towards sustainability. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2024;23(1):88-120.
[41] Chen Z. Responsible AI in Organizational Training: Applications, Implications, and Recommendations for Future Development. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2024;23(4):498-521.
[42] Matthias A. The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata. Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(3):175–183.
[43] Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288.
[44] Vaismoradi M, Jones J, Turunen H, Snelgrove S. Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. 2016.
[45] Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-115.
[46] Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112.
[47] Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Sage; 2002.
[48] Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59-82.
[49] Patton C, Sawicki D, Clark J. Basic methods of policy analysis and planning—Pearson eText. Routledge; 2015.
[50] Norris LS, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):160940691773384.
[51] Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. 3rd ed. Sage; 2013.
[52] Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Sage; 2016.
[53] Duke T. Building responsible AI algorithms. Springer; 2023. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4842-9306-5
[54] Dignum V. Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Vol. 1. Cham: Springer; 2019.
[55] Martin K. Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. J Bus Ethics. 2019;160(4):835-850.
[56] Yam J, Skorburg JA. From human resources to human rights: Impact assessments for hiring algorithms. Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(4):611-623.
[57] Bujold A, Roberge-Maltais I, Parent-Rocheleau X, Boasen J, Sénécal S, Léger PM. Responsible artificial intelligence in human resources management: a review of the empirical literature. AI Ethics. 2023;1-16.
[58] Rodgers W, Murray JM, Stefanidis A, Degbey WY, Tarba SY. An artificial intelligence algorithmic approach to ethical decision-making in human resource management processes. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2023;33(1):100925.
[59] Koenig N, Tonidandel S, Thompson I, Albritton B, Koohifar F, Yankov G, et al. Improving measurement and prediction in personnel selection through the application of machine learning. Pers Psychol. 2023;76(4):1061-1123.
[60] Tippins NT, Oswald FL, McPhail SM. Scientific, legal, and ethical concerns about AI-based personnel selection tools: a call to action. Pers Assess Decis. 2021;7(2):1.
[61] Masood A. Responsible AI in the Enterprise: Practical AI Risk Management for Explainable, Auditable, and Safe Models with Hyperscalers and Azure OpenAI. 2023.
[62] Varma A, Dawkins C, Chaudhuri K. Artificial intelligence and people management: A critical assessment through the ethical lens. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2023;33(1):100923.
[63] Manoharan P. A Review on Cybersecurity in HR Systems: Protecting Employee Data in the Age of AI. Regul. GDPR. 2024; 4:605-612.
[64] Rocha JF. Ethical implementation of AI in job candidate recruitment: insights on data protection, Artificial Intelligence and legal perspectives. Braz J Law Technol Innov. 2024;2(1):120-139.
[65] Bryson JJ. Human Experience and AI Regulation: What European Union Law Brings to Digital Technology Ethics. Weizenbaum J Digit Soc. 2023;3(3).
[66] Raghavan M, Barocas S, Kleinberg J, Levy K. Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency; 2020. p. 469-481.
[67] Rakova B, Yang J, Cramer H, Chowdhury R. Where responsible AI meets reality: Practitioner perspectives on enablers for shifting organizational practices. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2021; 5:1-23.
[68] Kim PT, Bodie MT. Artificial intelligence and the challenges of workplace discrimination and privacy. ABAJ Lab & Emp L. 2020; 35:289.
[69] Lacroux A, Martin-Lacroux C. Should I trust the artificial intelligence to recruit? Recruiters’ perceptions and behavior when faced with algorithm-based recommendation systems during resume screening. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:895997.
[70] Islam M, Mamun AA, Afrin S, Ali Quaosar GA, Uddin MA. Technology adoption and human resource management practices: the use of artificial intelligence for recruitment in Bangladesh. South Asian J Hum Resour Manag. 2022;9(2):324-349.
[71] London AJ. Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: accuracy versus explainability. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49(1):15-21.
[72] Golbin I, Rao AS, Hadjarian A, Krittman D. Responsible AI: a primer for the legal community. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on big data (Big Data); 2020. p. 2121-2126. IEEE.
[73] Sharkey A. Can robots be responsible moral agents? And why should we care? Connection Sci. 2017;29(3):210–216.
[74] Coeckelbergh M. Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence. AI Ethics. 2023;3(4):1341-1350.
[75] Doshi-Velez F, Kim B. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608. 2017.
[76] Theodorou A, Dignum V. Towards ethical and socio-legal governance in AI. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2(1):10–12.
[77] European Commission. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union. 2016;L119:1-88.
[78] Giermindl LM, Strich F, Christ O, Leicht-Deobald U, Redzepi A. The dark sides of people analytics: reviewing the perils for organisations and employees. Eur J Inf Syst. 2022;31(3):410-435.
[79] Selbst AD, Barocas S. The intuitive appeal of explainable machines. Fordham L Rev. 2018;87:1085.
[80] Wieringa M. What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency; 2020. p. 1-18.
[81] Simmons & Simmons and Jacob Turner. HireVue AI Explainability Statement. HireVue; 2022. Available from: https://www.hirevue.com/ai-in-hiring
[82] Application of AI in Recruitment and Selection. Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: The Future that Comes True. 2024;234.
[83] Du J. Ethical and Legal Challenges of AI in Human Resource Management. J Comput Electron Inf Manag. 2024;13(2):71-77.
[84] Konidena BK, Malaiyappan JNA, Tadimarri A. Ethical Considerations in the Development and Deployment of AI Systems. Eur J Technol. 2024;8(2):41–53.
[85] Gunning D, Aha D. DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Mag. 2019;40(2):44-58.
[86] Chiwara JR, Mjoli TQ, Chinyamurindi WT. Factors that influence the use of the Internet for job-seeking purposes amongst a sample of final-year students in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. SA J Hum Resour Manag. 2017;15(1):1-9.
[87] Dastin J. Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. In: Ethics of data and analytics; 2022. p. 296-299.
[88] Fernández-Martínez C, Fernández A. AI and recruiting software: Ethical and legal implications. Paladyn J Behav Robot. 2020;11(1):199-216.
[89] Chen Z. Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: removing human prejudices in employment. Cogn Technol Work. 2023;25(1):135-149.
[90] Yadav S, Kapoor S. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adopting artificial intelligence (AI) for employee recruitment: the influence of contextual factors. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2024;15(5):1828-1840.
[91] Yarger L, Cobb Payton F, Neupane B. Algorithmic equity in the hiring of underrepresented IT job candidates. Online Inf Rev. 2020;44(2):383-395.
[92] Binns R. Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency; 2018 Jan. p. 149-159. PMLR.
[93] Solove DJ. Artificial intelligence and privacy. Fla L Rev. 2025;77:1.
[94] Brundage M, Avin S, Wang J, Belfield H, Krueger G, Hadfield G, et al. Toward trustworthy AI development: mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07213. 2020.
[95] Khoa BQ. Influential factors of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the digital transformation of the human resources recruitment process sector in Vietnam. Int J Multidiscip Res Growth Eval. 2024;5(6):1118-1193.
