شناسایی چارچوب و مدل مفهومی کسب‌وکار در توسعه میادین نفت‌وگاز: رویکردی مبتنی بر زنجیره ارزش

نوع مقاله : توصیفی و نظرسنجی

نویسندگان
مصطفی منفرد
محمود دهقان نیری
علی رجب زاده
گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
هدف: در تجزیه‌وتحلیل زنجیره ارزش در سطح صنعت، شناسایی چارچوب کسب‌وکارها و روابط تأمین‌کننده/ مشتری از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. صنعت نفت‌وگاز بزرگ‌ترین تأمین‌کننده انرژی و بخش اقتصادی کشور است. زنجیره ارزش در صنعت نفت‌وگاز از مرحله اکتشاف تا مصرف نهایی دامنه وسیعی از بازار و کسب‌وکارها را در بر می‌گیرد. در این پژوهش، نمای کلی زنجیره ارزش این صنعت ترسیم و ساختار دولتی و خصوصی و همچنین سیاست‌گذاران و صاحبان منافع آن مشخص شد.

روش‌شناسی: به کمک خبرگان و بهره‌گیری از روش دلفی، چارچوب کلی کسب‌وکارها، اهداف و شاخص‌های عملکردی بنگاه و عوامل مؤثر بر آنها شناسایی شد. در ادامه یک مدل مفهومی برای ارزیابی کسب‌وکارهای توسعه میدان بر‌اساس اهداف بنگاه، عوامل مؤثر بر اهداف، پیوند میان کسب‌وکارها و دوره‌های زمانی توسعه داده شد.
یافته‌ها: چارچوب نهایی‌شده‌ کسب‌وکارهای بخش توسعه میادین نفت‌وگاز در زنجیره ارزش نفت‌وگاز در چهار سطح مختلف و مشتمل بر 52 کسب‌وکار فعال ترسیم شد.

نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان داد که در مدل مفهومی ارائه‌شده هفت هدف اصلی و 11 عامل در سه بخش کلی شامل عوامل تأثیرگذار مستقیم، عوامل ناشی از پیوند میان کسب‌وکارها و عوامل کلان خارج از صنعت برای هر بنگاه فعال در این بخش از صنعت در نظر گرفته می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
زنجیره ارزش
نفت‌وگاز
کسب‌وکارهای توسعه میدان
مدل مفهومی
شاخص‌های عملکردی

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying the framework and a business conceptual model for the oil and gas fields development: value chain approach

نویسندگان English

Mostafa Monfared
Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri
Ali Rajabzadeh
Ph.D candidate, Industrial Management Department, Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Objective: In analyzing the value chain at the industry level, it is very important to identify the framework of businesses and supplier/customer relationships. The oil and gas industry is the largest energy supplier and economic sector of the Iran. The value chain in the oil and gas industry includes a wide range of markets and businesses from the exploration to the consumption. In this research, the overview of the value chain of this industry was drawn and the government and private structures as well as policy makers and its stakeholders were determined.

Methodology: With the help of experts and using the Delphi method, the general framework of businesses, the goals and performance indicators of a firm and the factors affecting them were identified. Next, a conceptual model was developed to evaluate field development businesses based on the firm's goals, factors affecting the goals, business graftings, and time periods.

Findings: The finalized framework of field development businesses in the oil and gas value chain was drawn at 4 different levels includes 52 active businesses.

Conclusion: The results showed that in the presented conceptual model, 7 main goals and 11 factors are considered in three general categories, including direct influencing factors, factors caused by the business graftings, and macro factors from the outside of industry for each enterprise present in this sector of the industry.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Value chain
Oil and Gas
Field development businesses
Conceptual model
performance indicators
1. Kothandaraman P, Wilson DT. The Future of Competition: Value-Creating Networks. Vol. 30, Industrial Marketing Management. 2001. p. 379–89.
2. Porter ME. The value chain and competitive advantage. Underst Bus Process. 2001;2:50–66.
3. Loasby BJ. The organisation of capabilities. J Econ Behav Organ. 1998;35(2):139–60.
4. Alghamdi O, Agag G. Competitive advantage: A longitudinal analysis of the roles of data-driven innovation capabilities, marketing agility, and market turbulence. J Retail Consum Serv. 2024;76:103547.
5. Kiamehr AK, Azar A, Nayeri MD. A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Designing Business Portfolio in the Oil Industry. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res. 2018;8(6):3657–67.
6. Tyapukhin AP. Value chain management versus supply chain management. Int J Manag Concepts Philos. 2023;16(4):335–53.
7. Almeida N, Trindade M, Komljenovic D, Finger M. A conceptual construct on value for infrastructure asset management. Util Policy. 2022;75:101354.
8. Khalifa AS. Customer value: a review of recent literature and an integrative configuration. Manag Decis [Internet]. 2004 Jan 8;42(5):645–66. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150101
9. Smith JB, Colgate M. Customer value creation: a practical framework. J Mark Theory Pract. 2007;15(1):7–23.
10. Crain DW, Abraham S. Using value‐chain analysis to discover customers’ strategic needs. Strateg Leadersh. 2008;36:29–39.
11. Ayodele OF. Regulatory Successes and Opportunities for Value Chain Analysis of Gas Industries. In: Sustainable Utilization of Natural Gas for Low-Carbon Energy Production: Attaining Low-Carbon Energy Production Through Sustainable Natural Gas Utilization. Springer; 2024. p. 23–37.
12. Schmeisser B. A systematic review of literature on offshoring of value chain activities. J Int Manag. 2013;19(4):390–406.
13. Yeung HW. Regional development in the global economy: A dynamic perspective of strategic coupling in global production networks. Reg Sci Policy Pract. 2015;7(1):1–23.
14. Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Vol. 16, Journal of Cleaner Production. 2008. p. 1699–710.
15. Wirba AV. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of government in promoting CSR. J Knowl Econ. 2024;15(2):7428–54.
16. Srivastava SK. Green supply‐chain management: a state‐of‐the‐art literature review. Int J Manag Rev. 2007;9(1):53–80.
17. Miller HG, Mork P. From data to decisions: A value chain for big data. Vol. 15, IT Professional. 2013. p. 57–9.
18. Dolgui A, Ivanov D, Sokolov B. Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(1–2):414–30.
19. Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Musa A, Dauda M, El-Berishy NM, Cang S. A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;147:531–43.
20. Ebn-Yamini, Sh. (2018). Technology as a foctor of changing the national companies from passive players to active players in global oil industry. Sience and Technology Policy, 22, 31-38, persian.
21. Chima CM. Supply-Chain Management Issues In The Oil And Gas Industry. Vol. 5, Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER). 2011.
22. Yusuf Y, Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, Auchterlounie W, Hollomah D, Menhat M. Performance measurement in the natural gas industry: a case study of Ghana natural gas supply chain. Benchmarking An Int J. 2018;
23. Energy balance sheet for the year 2018. (2020). Planning and Macroeconomics of Electricity and Energy Office; Deputy of Electricity and Energy Affairs of the Ministry of Energy, persian.
24. Ghasemishad, H. (2015). https://www.ghasemishad.ir/business-management/172-Management of Supply Chain and Value Chain.html, persian.
25. Shafiee, A. (2019). Investigating the challenges of privatization in the Iranian economy and a case study on the oil industry. The 6th National Conference on Management and Humanities Research in Iran, persian.
26. Hydrocarbone balance sheet for the year 2017. (2019). Institude for International Energy Studies, Deputy of Planning of the Ministry of Oil, persian.
پژوهش های مدیریت منابع سازمانی
دوره 14، شماره 4
اسفند 1403
صفحه 127-159