طراحی سنجه اندازه گیری ابعاد نرم پایایی سازمانی: پژوهش ترکیبی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رفتار سازمانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
4 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
نرخ بالای تغییرات گسترده محیط معاصر شرایط سخت­تری را برای سازمان‌ها ایجاد و عملکرد آنها را مختل می­کند. بنابراین، توانایی سازمان­ها برای حفظ عملکرد مناسب علیرغم بحران­های پیش‌آمده، در سال­های اخیر اهمیت یافته است. یکی از موضوعات مهم در این شرایط این است که چگونه می­توان پایایی سازمان­ها یا همان توان حفظ عملکرد مناسب آنها در شرایط بحران را ارتقا داد. پایایی سازمانی دو ساحت سخت و نرم دارد که ابعاد ساحت سخت آن چندین دهه است موردتوجه پژوهشگران قرار گرفته است ولی به ابعاد ساحت نرم آن کمتر پرداخته شده است. بدین ترتیب به­رغم دامنه کاربرد گسترده و توجهات نظری اخیر معطوف به ابعاد ساحت نرم پایایی سازمانی، کماکان ابعاد و مولفه­های این نوع پایایی به‌صورتی‌که بتواند به پیاده­سازی آن در سازمان­ها کمک کند شناسایی و تدوین نشده است. بنابراین این پژوهش کوشیده است با استفاده از طرح پژوهش ترکیبی اکتشافی متوالی و براساس مصاحبه­های نیمه‌ساختاریافته و مرور مقالات منتشرشده و با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون، مضامین اصلی و فرعی و کدها استخراج شوند که به ابعاد، مولفه­ها و شاخص‌های نرم پایایی سازمانی تغییر نام داده شدند (پژوهش کیفی) و در مرحله دوم برای تعیین روایی سازه از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده کند. نتیجه حاصل شده نوعی سنجه روا برای اندازه­گیری پایایی در سازمان­هاست.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Designing a scale to measure the soft dimensions of organizational reliability: Mixed research

نویسندگان English

mansooreh moeini korbekandi 1
Ahmad Ali Khaefelahi 2
Hasan Danaeifard 3
Seyed Hosein Kazemi 4
1 Organizational behavior Ph.D. candidate, faculty of management & economics, TarbiatModares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate professor, public administration department, faculty of management & economics, TarbiatModaresUniversity (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, public administration department, faculty of management & economics, TarbiatModaresUniversity (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
4 Assistant professor, public administration department, faculty of management & economics, TarbiatModares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The high rate of extensive changes in the contemporary environment creates more difficult conditions for organizations and disrupts their performance. Therefore, the ability of organizations to maintain proper performance has become important in recent years despite the crises that have occurred. One of the important issues in this situation is how can improve the reliability of organizations or the ability to maintain their proper performance in crisis conditions. Organizational reliability has two hard and soft areas that the dimensions of its hard area have attracted the attention of researchers for several decades but the dimensions of its soft area have been less addressed. In this way, despite the scope of wide application and the recent theoretical attention focused on the dimensions of the soft area of organizational reliability, still the dimensions and components of this type of reliability have not been identified and formulated in a way that can help its implementation in organizations. Therefore, this research has tried to extract main and sub-themes and codes which were renamed the soft dimensions, components and indicators of organizational reliability by using the sequential exploratory mixed research design based on semi-structured interviews and review of published articles and using thematic analysis method (qualitative research) and in the second step, use confirmatory factor analysis to determine construct validity. The obtained result is a valid measure for measuring reliability in organizations.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Organizational reliability
Soft dimensions of organizational reliability
Mixed Research
Exploratory interview
[1] O’Brien, K., Sygna, L., Haugen, J.E. “Vulnerable or Resilient? A Multi Scale Assessment of Climate Impacts and Vulnerability in Norway”. Climatic change, 64(1-2), (2004): 193-225.
[2] Rougier, J., Sparks, S., Aspinall, W., Cornell, S., Crosweller, S., Edwards, T., Freer, J., Hill, L., Hincks, T. “SAPPUR: NERC scoping study on uncertainty and risk in natural hazards”. BRISK, University of Bristol. (2010).
[3] Chandler, R.E., Thorne, P., Lawrimore, J., Willett, K. “Building trust in climate science: data products for the 21st century”. Environmetrics, 23, (2012): 373–381.
[4] Agwu, A.E., Labiba, A., Hadleigh-Dunnb, S. “Disaster prevention through a harmonized framework for high reliability organisations”. Safety Science, 111, (2019): 298-312.
[5] Berland, A., Holm, A.L., Gundersen, D., Bentsen, S.B. “Patient safety culture in home care: experiences of home-care nurses”. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(6), (2012): 794–801.
[6] Goodman, P.S. et al. “Organizational Errors: Directions for Future Research”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, (2011): 151–176.
[7] Bagnara, S., Parlangeli, O., Tartaglia, R. “Are hospitals becoming high reliability organizations?” Applied Ergonomics, 41(5), (2010): 713-8.
[8] Roberts, K., Rousseau, D.M. “Research in nearly failure-free, high reliability organisations: Having the bubble”. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2), (1989): 132-139.
[9] Ghaith, A., Ma, H., Labib, A.W. “A pursuit to reliability – Toward a structural based reliability framework (FSR)”. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(4), (2022): 936-960.
[10] Gordon, R., Flin, R., Mearns, K. “Designing and Evaluating a Human Factors Investigation Tool (HFIT) for Accident Analysis”. Safety Science, 43(3), (2005): 147-171.
[11] INSAG-7 “The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of insag-1, a report by the international nuclear safety advisory group”. International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, Austria, (1992).
[12] Labib, A., Read, M. “Not just rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic: learning from failures through Risk and Reliability Analysis”. Safety Science, 51(1), (2013): 397–413.
[13] Labib, A. “Learning from Failures: Decision Analysis of Major Disasters”. Elsevier Science, (2014): 336 pages.
[14] Labib, A., Harris, M.J. “Learning how to learn from failures – the Fukushima nuclear disaster”. Engineering Failure Analysis, 47, (2015): 117–128.
[15] Moura, R., Beer, M., Patelli, E., Lewis, J., Knoll, F. “Learning from major accidents to improve system design”. Safety Science, 84, (2016): 37–45.
[16] Cyert, R.M., March, J.G. “A Behavioral Theory of the Firm”. Englewood Clis, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (1963).
[17] Simon, H.A. “Administrative Behavior”. New York, NY: The Free Press, 4th edn. (1997).
[18] Biggiero, L. “Organizations as cognitive systems is knowledge an emergent property of information networks?”. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. (2007).
[19] Hodgkinson, G.P., Healey, M.P. “Cognition in organizations”. Annual Review of Sociology, 59, (2008): 387–417.
[20] Weick, K.E. “Organizational culture as a source of high reliability”. California Management Review, 29, (1987): 112–127.
[21] LaPorte, T.R., Consolini, P. “Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of high reliability organizations”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, (1991): 19–47.
[22] Roe, E., Schulman, P. “High Reliability Management – Operating on the Edge”. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. (2008).
[23] Riley, W., Lownik, E., Parrotta, C., RN, K.M., Davis, S. “Creating High Reliability Teams in Healthcare through In situ Simulation Training”. Administrative Sciences, 1(1), (2011): 14-31.
[24] Pettersen Gould, K. “Acknowledging the role of abductive thinking: A way out of proceduralization for safety management and oversight?”. in Trapping Safety into Rules How Desirable or Avoidable is Proceduralization? ed. by C. Bieder, M. Bourrier (2013): 107-117.
[25] Mensik, J. “High reliability and excellence in staffing”. Journal of nursing economic, 33(5), (2015): 283-4.
[26] Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. “Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty”. Second ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. (2007).
[27] Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. “Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World”. John Wiley & Sons. (2015).
[28] Wildavsky, A.B. “Searching for Safety”. New Brunswich N.J.: Transaction Books. (1988).
[29] Gibson, C.A., Tarrant, M.A. “Conceptual Models' Approach to Organisation Resilience”. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 25(2), (2010): 6-12.
[30] Brown, C., Seville, E., Vargo, J. “Measuring the organizational resilience of critical infrastructure providers: A New Zealand case study”. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 18, (2017): 37-49.
[31] Atkinson, S., Moffat, J. “The Agile Organization: From Informal Networks to Complex Effects and Agility”. Department of Defence Command and Control Research Program, Washington, D.C. (2005).
[32] Somers, S. “Measuring Resilience Potential: An Adaptive Strategy for Organizational Crisis Planning”. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(1), (2009): 12-23.
[33] Limnios, E.A.M., Mazzarol, T., Ghadouani, A., Schilizzi, S.G. “The resilience architecture framework: four organizational archetypes”. European Management Journal, 32(1), (2014): 104-116.
[34] Hohenstein, N.O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., Giunipero, L. “Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: a systematic review and paths for further investigation”. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), (2015): 90-117.
[35] Kantur, D., Say, A.I. “Measuring Organizational Resilience: A Scale Development”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3), (2015): 456-472.
[36] Orchiston, C., Prayag, G.Y., Brown, C. “Organizational resilience in the tourism sector”. Annals of Tourism Research, 56, (2016): 145-148.
[37] McCarthy, I.P., Collard, M., Johnson, M. “Adaptive organizational resilience: an evolutionary perspective”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, (2017): 33-40.
[38] Guldenmund, F.W. “The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research”. Safety Science, 34, (2000): 215–257.
[39] Henson, R.K., Roberts, J.K. “Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice”. Educational and Psychological measurement, 66(3), (2006): 393-416.
[40] Wu, T.C., Lin, C.H., Shiau, S.Y. “Developing measures for assessing the causality of safety culture in a petrochemical industry”. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 9(5-6), (2009): 507-15.
[41] Antonsen, S. “Safety culture and the issue of power”. Safety Science, 47, (2009): 183-191.
[42] Amran, A., Keat Ooi, S. “Sustainability reporting: meeting stakeholder demands”. Strategic Direction, 30(7), (2014): 38-41.
[43] LaPorte, T., Consolini, P. “Theoretical and operational challenges of “high-reliability organizations”: Air-traffic control and aircraft carriers”. International Journal of Public Administration, 21(6–8), (1998): 847–852.
[44] Roberts, K.H., Bea, R. “Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organisations”. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), (2001): 70-79.
[45] Madsen, P.M., Desai, V. “Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry”. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), (2010): 451–476.
[46] Youngberg, B.J. “Assessing your organization’s potential to become a high reliability organization”. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 24(3), (2004): 13–20.
[47] Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D. “Organizing and the process of Sensemaking”. Organization Science, 16(4), (2005): 409–421.
[48] Labib, A., Read, M. “A hybrid model for learning from failures: the Hurricane Katrina disaster”. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), (2015): 7869–7881.
[49] Waller, M.J., Roberts, K.H. “High reliability and organisational behaviour: Finally the twain must meet”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, (2003): 813-814.
[50] Perrow, C. “Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies” New York: Basic Books. (1984).
[51] Rijpma, J.A. “Complexity, Tight–Coupling and Reliability: Connecting Normal Accidents Theory and High Reliability Theory”. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 5(1), (1997): 15.
[52] Lekka, C. “High reliability organisations: A review of the literature”. The Health and Safety Executive. (2011).
[53] Vogus, T.J., Welbourne, T.M. “Structuring for high-reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organisations”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, (2003): 877–903.
[54] Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D. “Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, (1999): 81–123.
[55] Marais, K., Dulac, N., Leveson, N. “Beyond normal accidents and high reliability organisations: The need for an alternative approach to safety in complex systems”. Paper presented at the Engineering Systems Division Symposium, MIT, Cambridge, MA, (2004): 29-31 March.
[56] Tamuz, M., Harrison, M.I. “Improving safety in hospitals: Contributions of high reliability theory and normal accident theory”. Health Research and Educational Trust, 41(4), (2006): 1654-1673.
[57] Weick, K.E. “Sensemaking in organizations”. London: Sage. (1995).
[58] Brown, A.D. “Making sense of inquiry sensemaking”. Journal of Management Studies, 37, (2000): 45-75.
[59] Maitlis, S. “The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking”. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), (2005): 21-49.
[60] Gioia, D.A., Chittipeddi, K. “Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation”. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), (1991): 433–448.
[61] Weick, K. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), (1976): 1-19.
[62] Orton, J.D., Weick, K.E. “Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization”. Academy of Management Review, 15, (1990): 203-223.
[63] Hales, D.N., Chakravorty, S.S. “Creating high reliability organizations using mindfulness”. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), (2016): 2873-2881.
[64] Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J. “Structural inertia and organizational change”. American Sociological Review, 49, (1984): 149–164.
[65] Roberts, K.H. “New challenges in organizational research: High reliability organizations”. Organization & Environment, 3(2), (1989): 111–125.
[66] Oster, C., Braaten, J. “High reliability organizations: A healthcare handbook for patient safety & quality”. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau. (2016).
[67] Ramanujam, R., Roberts, K.H. (Eds.). “Organizing for reliability: A guide for research and practice”. Stanford University Press. (2018).
[68] Bie ´nkowska, A., Tworek, K., Zabłocka-Kluczka, A. “Organizational Reliability. Human Resources, Information Technology and Management”. Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, ISBN 978036748395 1. Forthcoming. (2020).
[69] Starbuck, W.H. Karl E. “Weick and the dawning awareness of organized cognition”. Management Decision, 53(6), (2015): 1287–1299.
[70] Tillement, S., Hayes, J. “Maintenance schedules as boundary objects for improved organizational reliability”. Cognition, Technology and Work, Springer Verlag, 21, (2019): 497-515.
[71] Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D. “Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness”. Crisis management, 3, (2008): 81–123.
[72] Lekka, C., Sugden, C. “The successes and challenges of implementing high reliability principles: A case study of a UK oil refinery”. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 8(9), (2011): 443–451.
[73] دانایی فرد، ح. «هم‌سازی شیوه‌های کمی و کیفی در پژوهش‌های سازمانی: تاملی بر استراتژی پژوهش ترکیبی»، روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، سال 13، شماره 53، (1386): صص 35-63.
[74] Strauss, A., Corbin, J. “Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory”. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (1998).
[75] Braun, V., Clarke, V. “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), (2006): 77-101.
[76] Myers, K.K., Oetzel, J.G. “Exploring the dimensions of organizational assimilation: Creating and validating a measure”. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), (2003): 438-457.
[77] Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. “A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)”. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (2017a).
[78] Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM”. European Business Review, 31(1), (2019): 2-24.
[79] Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., Kaiser, S. “Guidelines for choosing between multiitem and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), (2012): 434-449.
[80] Drolet, A.L., Morrison, D.G. “Do We Really Need Multiple-Item Measures in Service Research?”. Journal of Service Research, 3(3), (2001): 196-204.
[81] Voorhees, C.M., Brady, M.K., Calantone, R., Ramirez, E. “Discriminant Validity Testing in Marketing: An Analysis, Causes for Concern, and Proposed Remedies”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), (2016): 119-134.
[82] Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), (2015): 115-135.
[83] Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. “A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equations Modeling (PLS-SEM)”, Thousand Oaks: SAGE. (2017b).
[84] Rigdon, E.E. “Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Breaking Chains and Forging Ahead”. Long Range Planning, 47(3), (2014b): 161-167.
[85] Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Henseler, J., Hair, J.F. “On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM: A Commentary on Rigdon (2012)”. Long Range Planning, 47(3), (2014): 154-160.
[86] Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez, Estrada J.M., Chatla, S.B. “The Elephant in the Room: Evaluating the Predictive Performance of PLS Models”. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), (2016): 4552-4564.
[87] Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Hair, J.F. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling”. In: Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (eds). Handbook of Market Research. Heidelberg: Springer. (2017a).
[88] Latan, H. “PLS Path Modeling in Hospitality and Tourism Research: The Golden Age and Days of Future Past”. In: Ali F., Rasoolimanesh, S.M., Cobanoglu, C. (eds). Applying Partial Least Squares in Tourism and Hospitality Research. Bingley: Emerald, (2018): 53-84.
[89] Bollen, K.A., Ting, K-f. “A Tetrad Test for Causal Indicators”. Psychological Methods, 5(1), (2000): 3-22.