مدل ریسک توسعه منابع انسانی در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان با رویکرد آمیخته

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری تحقیق در عملیات، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
2 استاد تمام، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.
4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
امروزه، سازمان‌ها برای توسعه نیروهای خود با ریسک‌ها و ابهامهای فراوانی مواجه هستند. سازمان‌ها هزینه‌ بسیاری دربرابر توسعه نیروهای خود صرف کرده و از بازگشت‌پذیری سرمایه‌ خود اطمینان کافی ندارند. ازسویدیگر، اهتمام به توسعه و ارتقای سرمایه‌ انسانی در سازمان‌ها، امری حیاتی است. هدف این پژوهش ضمن مروری بر الگوهای ریسک و توسعه منابع انسانی، ارائه الگوی ریسک توسعه منابع انسانی در سازمان‌های دانشبنیان با استفاده از روش پژوهش آمیخته است. پژوهش حاضر از حیث نتیجه در مرحله اول، یک پژوهش توسعهای و در مرحله دوم یک پژوهش کاربردی است. جمعآوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی بهوسیله 17 مصاحبه نیمهساختار یافته با خبرگان و در بخش کمی بهوسیله توزیع 100پرسشنامه انجام شده است. برای تجزیهوتحلیل داده‌های جمع‌آوریشده در بخش کیفی از روش تحلیل مضمون و در بخش کمی از روش معادلات ساختاری استفاده شده است. یافته‌ها نشان میدهد که ابعاد فردی ریسک توسعه منابع انسانی مانند ریسک‌های دانشی و مهارتی، ریسک‌های رفتاری و ریسک ادراکی از اهمیت و اولویت بالاتری نسبت به ریسک‌های سازمانی مانند ریسک‌های عملیاتی و محیط منابع انسانی برخوردار هستند. مدیران سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان بهوسیله مدل ریسک توسعه منابع انسانی قادر خواهند بود که تحلیل جامع‌تری از ریسک توسعه منابع انسانی در بعد فردی و سازمانی داشته و جهت کاهش ریسک توسعه منابع انسانی بهینهتر عمل کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

A model of human resource development risk in the knowledge-Based organization (mixed method research)

نویسندگان English

masood ghafari 1
Maghsoud Amiri 2
amir yousefli 3
Mirali Seyednaghavi 4
1 PhD student of operation research, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
4 Associate professor, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Today, many organizations meet with many risks to employee development. They are suspicious about return on investment in employee development. Managers expect that developing investments improve employee performance and organizational wellbeing. The organization spent time, cost, and experience on employee development, but the turnover of employees, less of competence, limitation of competence, absence, and leaving the organization cause human resource development risk. The purpose of this research is to review the articles on risks and human resource development. After that, a model of human resource development risk in the knowledge-Based organization was presented. The method of this research is a mixed approach. This mix-method is a developmental and applied study. The model of human resource development risk used was designed based on interviews with 17 experts in this field. To evaluate the model, a fieldwork questionnaire was distributed among 100 experts. The collected data were analyzed via Theme analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. The findings indicate individual dimension is less mentioned in the literature, but it is a high priority for the organizational dimension. perceptual risk, knowledge risk, and behavioral risk are three components of individual risk and human resource environment risk with operational risks are two components of organizational risk. Managers can better analyze via the human resource development risk model in individual and organizational dimensions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

risk
human resource risk
human resource development risk
mixed method
Knowledge-based organization
[1] رحمان سرشت ح، ذبیحی جامخانه م. دی.ان. ای شرکت های دانش بنیان. رشد فناوری.1395، 13(49): 1-8.
[2] جعفری م، راهبرد اقتصاد دانش بنیان الزامات/راهکارها. 1401؛ 10(1-2):4-8.
[3] شاکری ا، دهقانان ح، خاشعی و، تقوی فرد س. تحلیل شناختی مدل های ذهنی مدیران در فرآیند مدیریت ریسک منابع انسانی جهت ارتقای عملکرد سازمانی با استفاده از تکنیک استخراج استعاره ای زالتمن، مدیریت بهره وری (فراسوی مدیریت). 1400؛ 15(2):23 -49.
[4] Sakthi Ananthan S, Abdul Manaf H, Hidayati M, Suluh Kusuma Dewi D. The development of talent management in Malaysian public sector: A compre-hensive review. Problems and Perspectives in Management.2019;17:242–53.
[5] OECD. Risk Management and Corporate Governance. OECD 2014:1-96.
[6] Sweis, R. J., Ghalion, R., El-Mashaleh, M., Amayreh, I., Niveen, A.-S., & Al Balkhi, W. The EFFECTS OF TRAINING AND MOTIVATING EM-PLOYEES ON IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES: The CASE OF JORDAN. International Journal of Infor-mation, Business and Management,2019; 11(2), 179–211.
[7] Kot-Radojewska M. The Relationship Between the Form of Employment and Employee Training and Developing Opportunities in Organizations. IJCM 2018; 17(1): 119-36.
[8] Gisela Stefánsdóttir s. Risks in human resources and their relation to organi-zational risk management Mitigating the HR risk of knowledge-loss, using knowledge management systems, MSc Human Resource Management and Organizational Psychology, University of Reykjavík, 2017.
[9] Ahn J-Y, Huang S. Types of employee training, organizational identification, and turnover intention: evidence from Korean employees. Problems and Per-spectives in Management 2020; 18(4): 517–526. [10] OECD. Risk Man-agement and Corporate Governance. OECD 2014:1-96.
[10] Bai Y, Yuan J, Pan J. Why SMEs in emerging economies are reluctant to provide employee training: Evidence from China. International Small Busi-ness Journal 2017; 35(6): 751–766.
[11] Huang W, Sun Q, Guan X, Peng S. Human Resource Risk Identification and Prevention. Control and Systems Engineering 2017; 1: 16–21.
[12] Paul, C, Mitlacher L, Expanding risk management systems: human resources and German banks. Strategic Change 2008; 17(1-2): 21–33.
[13] Hinton, M. Managing the Human Resource Risk. Franchising World 2003; 35(2), 58- 59.
[14] Hexter ES, Young MB. Managing human capital risk. New York: Confer-ence Board 2011: 1-46.
[15] Meyer M, Roodt G, Robbins M. Human resources risk management: Gov-erning people risks for improved performance. SA j. hum. resour. manag. 2011; 9(1): 23.
[16] Ernst & Young. 2008 golbal human resource risk: Ernst & Young; 2008: 1-76.
[16] Huang W, Sun Q, Guan X, Peng S. Human Resource Risk Identification and Prevention. Control and Systems Engineering 2017; 1: 16–21.
[17] Bozionelos N, Lin C-H, Lee KY. Enhancing the sustainability of employees' careers through training: The roles of career actors' openness and of supervi-sor support. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2020; 117: 1-55.
[18] کریمی ر، اعتباریان ا، سلطانی ا. ارائه الگوی ریسک‌های منابع انسانی. نشریه چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی،1399 11(1): 100-119.
[19] Woods P, Lasiuk GC. Risk prediction: a review of the literature. J Forensic Nurs 2008; 4(1): 1–11.
[20] Lima, Priscila Ferreira de Araújo, Crema M, Verbano C. Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal 2020; 38(1): 78–94.
[21] Baloyi T, Ozumba A. Strategic Risk Management among Small Enterprises in the Construction Industry. MATEC Web Conf. 2020; 312: 1–9.
[22] Cascio W, Boudreau J. HR strategy: optimizing risks, optimizing rewards. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance 2014; 1(1): 77–97.
[23] ISO 31000: Standards Policy and Strategy Committee;2018: 1-26.
[24] Fheili M. Developing human resources key risk indicators – Know Your Staff (KYS) practices. JOP 2006; 1(3): 71–85.
[25] Werner JM, DeSimone RL. Human resource development. 6th ed. Mason OH, Andover: South-Western; Cengage Learning [distributor] 2012.
[26] Park S, Kang H-S, Kim E-J. The role of supervisor support on employees’ training and job performance: an empirical study. EJTD 2018; 42(1/2): 57–74.
[27] Swanson RA, Holton EF. Foundations of human resource development. 2nd ed. San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler; London : McGraw-Hill [distribu-tor] 2009.
[28] Mäenpää I, Voutilainen R. Insurances for human capital risk management in SMEs. VINE 2012; 42(1): 52–66.
[29] Urban J. Human Resource Related Risks, Their Sources and Prevention. In-ternationa Business Information Management Association(IBIMA) 2018: 6002-6008.
[30] Stevens J. Managing risk: The human resources contribution / editor, John F. Stevens. London: LexisNexis Butterworths 2005.
[31] Becker K, Smidt M. A risk perspective on human resource management: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Re-view 2016; 26(2): 149–165.
[32] Ali Z, Mehreen A. Understanding succession planning as a combating strat-egy for turnover intentions. JAMR 2019; 16(2): 216–233.
[33] Mihaylov G, Zurbruegg R. The relationship between financial risk manage-ment and succession planning in family businesses. International Journal of Managerial Finance 2021; 17(3): 438–454.
[34] Diez F, Bussin M, Lee V. Fundamentals of HR analytics: A manual on be-coming HR analytical. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing 2019.
[35] Bashir N, Long CS. The relationship between training and organizational commitment among academicians in Malaysia. Journal of Management De-velopment 2015; 34(10): 1227–1245.
[36] Ali SHAH SN, SHAIKH NA, PIRZADA IA. Training and development: Its effects on job performance in the selected companies of UAE. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences 2018; 5(3): 181–195.
[37] Bapna R, Langer N, Mehra A, Gopal R, Gupta A. Human Capital Invest-ments and Employee Performance: An Analysis of IT Services Industry. Management Science 2013; 59(3): 641–658.
[38] Lee C-W, Wu W, Yang C-F. Employees’ Perceptions of Training and Sus-tainability of Human Resource. Sustainability 2019; 11(17): 1–11.
[39] Silzer RF, Dowell BE. Strategy-driven talent management: A leadership im-perative / Rob Silzer and Ben E. Dowell, editors ; foreword by Allen H. Church and Janine Waclawski. 1st ed. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass; Chichester : John Wiley [distributor] 2010.
[40] Langenegger PB, Mahler P, Staffelbach B. Effectiveness of talent manage-ment strategies. EJIM 2011; 5(5): 524-539.
[41] Hongal P, Kinange U. A Study on Talent Management and its Impact on Organization Performance- An Empirical Review. IJEMR 2020; 10(01): 64–71.
[42] Guangyu Z, Huajun L, Depeng Z. Risk Management on Knowledge Em-ployee Turnover in High-Tech Firms - Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. In: Risk Management on Knowledge Employees Turnover in High-Tech Firms - Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation; 2008; 399–402.
]43[ آذر ع، مؤمنی منصور. آمار و کاربرد آن در مدیریت، جلد دوم، انتشارات سمت.1393.
[44] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology.2006;3:77–101.
]45[ سبحانی‌فرد ی، اخوان خرازیان م. تحلیل عاملی،‌ مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و چند سطحی، انتشارات دانشگاه امام صادق(ع).