بررسی اثر‌های پاداش‌های مالی پیاپی بر عملکرد ایده‌پردازی کارکنان در صنعت فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات کشور چین

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد کارآفرینی سازمانی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه توسعه کارآفرینی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
ایده‌های خلاقانه کارکنان، منبع بینش‌ها و محصولات جدیدی هستند که زندگی روزمره را غنی می‌کنند. خلاقیت و ایده‌پردازی کارکنان نتیجه تعامل بین عوامل فردی و زمینه‌ای در محیط است. منبع اصلی خلاقیت و نوآوری در نقطه تلاقی بین مهارت‌ها و دانش فرد قرار دارد و بررسی این موضوع نیازمند مطالعه محرک‌های درونی و محیطی در بستر محیط سازمانی است. در این مطالعه که بر نقش پاداش‌های مالی در افزایش عملکرد ایده‌‌پردازی برای تولید ایده‌های جدید کسب‌وکاری و سرمایه‌گذاری در یک شتاب‌دهنده فعال در صنعت فناوری و ارتباطات در چین متمرکز شده است؛ تعداد 168 کارمند و متخصص در یک شتاب‌دهنده کشور چین برای حضور در یک آزمایش تجربی شرکت کرده‌اند. برای بررسی مداخله‌های مختلف تخصیص پاداش مستمر در فرایند ایده‌پردازی درجهت ایجاد ایده‌های کسب‌و‌کاری جدید، سه شکل مختلف از مقادیر تخصیص پاداش، در سه گروه حداکثری، تصادفی و صفر (گروه کنترل) برای تحقق آزمایش تجربی تعریف شد. نتیجه این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که تخصیص پاداش‌های مالی نه تنها باعث بهبود عملکرد ایده‌پردازی کارکنان‌ می‌شود بلکه عدم تخصیص پاداش‌ به این فرایند شرایط کاهش خلاقیت و نوآوری را در این زمینه فراهم می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

INVESTIGATING ON THE EFFECTS OF CONTINUOUS FINANCIAL REWARDS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES’ IDEA GENERATION IN THE ICT INDUSTRY OF CHINA

نویسندگان English

Faraz ghodratizadeh 1
Ehsan Chitsaz 2
Reza rostami 3
1 M.Sc., Corporate Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran. Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran. Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Employees' creative ideas are the source of new insights and products that enrich daily life and make a valuable contribution to business development. In other words, employee creativity is the result of interaction between individual and contextual factors with the environment; Also, the source of creativity and innovation is at the intersection between skills and knowledge of the individual and the study of this issue requires the study of internal and environmental triggers in the context of the organizational environment. In this study, which is focused on the role of financial rewards in enhancing the performance of new business/venture ideas in a High Tech ICT Accelerator in China, 168 volunteers employees at this accelerator participated in an empirical experiment. To explore the different interventions of continuous reward allocation in an idea generation process for creating new venture ideas, we defined three forms of maximum, random, and null (control group) types of reward in the experiment. The results of this study show that the allocation of financial rewards improves the performance of idea generation, but also in the lack of reward allocation into the idea generation process reduces creativity and innovation in this field.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Employees’ Idea Generation
Financial Rewards
Employees’ Creativity
M. Urbaniec and A. Żur, “Business model innovation in corporate entrepreneurship: exploratory insights from corporate accelerators,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 865–888, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11365-020-00646-1/FIGURES/2.
[2] M. D. Mumford, K. E. Medeiros, and P. J. Partlow, “Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge,” Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 30–47, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1002/JOCB.003.
[3] M. K. Poetz and R. Prügl, “Crossing domain-specific boundaries in search of innovation exploring the potential of pyramiding,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 897–914, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1111/J.1540-5885.2010.00759.X.
[4] E. von Hippel, “Democratizing Innovation: The Evolving Phenomenon of User Innovation,” International Journal of Innovation Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–40, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1260/175722209787951224.
[5] P. Kristensson and T. Norlander, “The creative product and process in computer-mediated groups,” Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 223–243, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1002/J.2162-6057.2003.TB00992.X.
[6] P. R. Magnusson, “Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology-based services,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 578–593, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1111/J.1540-5885.2009.00684.X.
[7] M. K. Poetz and M. Schreier, “The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 245–256, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1111/J.1540-5885.2011.00893.X.
[8] T. M. Amabile, “From individual creativity to organizational innovation.,” in Innovation: A cross-disciplinary perspective., Oslo 6, Norway: Norwegian University Press, 1988, pp. 139–166.
[9] X. Zhang and K. M. Bartol, “Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 107–128, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118.
[10] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 61, p. 101860, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2020.101860.
[11] K. W. Thomas and B. A. Velthouse, “Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An ‘Interpretive’ Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation,” https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 666–681, Oct. 1990, doi: 10.5465/AMR.1990.4310926.
[12] G. R. Oldham and A. Cummings, “Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 607–634, Jun. 1996, doi: 10.5465/256657.
[13] N. Anderson, K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou, “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Management, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1297–1333, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0149206314527128.
[14] J. Baer, “Domain Specificity and the Limits of Creativity Theory,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 16–29, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1002/JOCB.002.
[15] R. Fahey, A. C. Vasconcelos, and D. Ellis, “The impact of rewards within communities of practice: a study of the SAP online global community,” https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500140, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 186–198, 2017, doi: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.KMRP.8500140.
[16] A. Lopez-Cabrales, A. Pérez-Luño, and R. V. Cabrera, “Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity,” Human Resource Management, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 485–503, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1002/HRM.20295.
[17] R. M. Wiseman, G. Cuevas-Rodríguez, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia, “Towards a Social Theory of Agency,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 202–222, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1111/J.1467-6486.2011.01016.X.
[18] T. M. Amabile et al., “Creatvty in context update to: The social psychology of creativity,” Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, pp. 1–317, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.4324/9780429501234/CREATIVITY-CONTEXT-TERESA-AMABILE-TERESA-AMABILE-MARY-ANN-COLLINS-REGINA-CONTI-ELISE-PHILLIPS-MARTHA-PICARIELLO-JOHN-RUSCIO-DEAN-WHITNEY.
[19] B. F. Skinner, “Operant behavior.,” American Psychologist, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 503–515, Aug. 1963, doi: 10.1037/H0045185.
[20] R. Eisenberger and J. Cameron, “Reward, intrinsic interest, and creativity: New findings.,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 676–679, 1998, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.6.676.
[21] R. Eisenberger, L. Rhoades, and J. Cameron, “Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation?,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1026–1040, Nov. 1999, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1026.
[22] S. Trimi and J. Berbegal-Mirabent, “Business model innovation in entrepreneurship,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 449–465, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1007/S11365-012-0234-3/FIGURES/3.
[23] D. K. Kanbach and S. Stubner, “Corporate accelerators as recent form of startup engagement: The what, the why, and the how,” Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1761–1776, 2016, doi: 10.19030/JABR.V32I6.9822.
[24] T. Kohler, “Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups,” Business Horizons, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 347–357, May 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2016.01.008.
[25] T. Weiblen and H. W. Chesbrough, “Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation:,” http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 66–90, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1525/CMR.2015.57.2.66.
[26] A. Engelsberger, B. Halvorsen, J. Cavanagh, and T. Bartram, “Human resources management and open innovation: the role of open innovation mindset,” Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 194–215, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12281.
[27] F. Yuan and R. W. Woodman, “Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations,” https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 323–342, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995.
[28] W. Mischel and Y. Shoda, “A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing Situations, Dispositions, Dynamics, and Invariance in Personality Structure,” Psychological Review, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 246–268, 1995, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246.
[29] Z. Kunda, “The case for motivated reasoning,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 480–498, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
[30] R. S. Nickerson, “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises:,” https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175–220, Jun. 1998, doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
[31] A. M. Grant and J. W. Berry, “The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 73–96, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215085.
[32] James. L. Farr and C. M. Ford, “Individual innovation,” in Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, 1990, pp. 63–80. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97989-003
[33] N. Madjar, “Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83–100, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1348/096317907X202464.
[34] J. Dul, C. Ceylan, and F. Jaspers, “Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment,” Human Resource Management, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 715–734, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1002/HRM.20454.
[35] C. E. Shalley, J. Zhou, and G. R. Oldham, “The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?:,” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 933–958, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JM.2004.06.007.
[36] E. A. Saether, “Creativity-Contingent Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity: The Importance of Fair Reward Evaluation Procedures,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00974.
[37] E. F. Rietzschel, B. A. Nijstad, and W. Stroebe, “Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 933–946, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1016/J.JESP.2006.10.014.
[38] B. A. Hennessey and T. M. Amabile, “Creativity,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 569–598, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.093008.100416.
[39] C. H. CAMPBELL et al., “DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF JOBS,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 277–300, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.1990.TB01559.X.
[40] S. St-Onge, “Variables Influencing the Perceived Relationship Between Performance and Pay in a Merit Pay Environment,” Journal of Business and Psychology 2000 14:3, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 459–479, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1022932317340.
[41] R. L. Heneman and J. M. Werner, “Merit pay : linking pay to performance in a changing world,” p. 293, 2005.
[42] T. M. Amabile and M. G. Pratt, “The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning,” Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 36, pp. 157–183, 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.RIOB.2016.10.001.
[43] J. N. Choi, “Person–Environment Fit and Creative Behavior: Differential Impacts of Supplies–Values and Demands–Abilities Versions of Fit:,” https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704044308, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 531–552, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0018726704044308.
[44] M. Gagné and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and work motivation,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 331–362, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1002/job.322.
[45] W. Zhang, Z. Sjoerds, and B. Hommel, “Metacontrol of human creativity: The neurocognitive mechanisms of convergent and divergent thinking,” Neuroimage, vol. 210, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116572.
[46] R. Eisenberger and K. Byron, “Rewards and Creativity,” in Encyclopedia of Creativity, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 313–318. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-375038-9.00188-6.
[47] S. Bell, “Experimental Design,” International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, pp. 672–675, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00431-4.
[48] B. B. Frey, “Posttest-Only Control Group Design,” in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018. doi: 10.4135/9781506326139.N530.
[49] M. Urbaniec and A. Żur, “Business model innovation in corporate entrepreneurship: exploratory insights from corporate accelerators,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 865–888, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11365-020-00646-1/FIGURES/2.
[50] J. Karimi and Z. Walter, “Corporate Entrepreneurship, Disruptive Business Model Innovation Adoption, and Its Performance: The Case of the Newspaper Industry,” Long Range Planning, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 342–360, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.LRP.2015.09.004.
[51] S. A. Zahra, “Corporate entrepreneurship as knowledge creation and conversion: the role of entrepreneurial hubs,” Small Business Economics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 727–735, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1007/S11187-015-9650-4/TABLES/1.
[52] R. A. Baron, “Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ‘connect the dots’ to identify new business opportunities,” Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 104–119, 2006, doi: 10.5465/AMP.2006.19873412.
[53] J. Zhou and G. R. Oldham, “Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 151–167, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1002/J.2162-6057.2001.TB01044.X.
[54] A. C. Amason, R. C. Shrader, G. H. Tompson, A. C. Amason, R. C. Shrader, and G. H. Tompson, “Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 125–148, 2006, Accessed: Feb. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbvent:v:21:y:2006:i:1:p:125-148
[55] S. Shane, “Technological opportunities and new firm creation,” Management Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 205–220, 2001, doi: 10.1287/MNSC.47.2.205.9837.
[56] J. X. Y. Chong and M. Gagné, “Self-Determination Theory for Work Motivation,” in Management, Oxford University Press, 2019. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0182.
[57] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 61, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.