شناخت معیارهای شناسایی ظرفیت استعدادها در صنعت تلکام

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی کیفی

نویسندگان
داود ابراهیمی 1
آرین قلی پور 2
عباس نرگسیان 3
1 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه رهبری و سرمایه انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 استاد، گروه رهبری و سرمایه انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه رهبری و سرمایه انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
رقابت در صنعت از یک‌سو و نادربودن منابع‌ انسانی با‌استعداد ازسوی‌دیگر مدیران را متقاعد می‌سازد تا با ایجاد واحد مدیریت استعداد و تمرکز بر ظرفیت استعداد افراد و شناسایی آنها، نیاز سازمان در حال و آینده را پاسخ دهند. این پژوهش ضمن پاسخگویی به نیاز مدیران در این حوزه اقدام به شناخت معیارهایی کرده ‌است که بتوان از راه آن افراد با‌‌استعداد بالقوه را شناسایی کرد. این پژوهش از منظر ماهیت، اکتشافی و از منظر هدف کاربردی می‌باشد و ازآنجاکه شناسایی استعداد در صنعت تلکام به‌دلیل رشد مداوم و با سرعت فناوری اهمیت بیشتری دارد، از ابزار مصاحبه در جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌های دست اول استفاده شده ‌است. پس از طراحی و اجرای مصاحبه‌های نیمه ‌ساختاریافته با 16 تن از معاونان، مدیران، سرپرستان و کارشناسان ارشد واحد منابع‌ انسانی شرکت‌های فعال در این صنعت، از تحلیل تم به روش براون و کلارک (2006) بهره‌گیری شد. پس از کدگذاری داده‌های اولیه، معیارهای شناسایی ظرفیت استعدادها در سه دسته کلی معیارهای فردی، معیارهای شغلی و معیارهای سازمانی برخاسته از ده تم فرعی ایجاد شدند. در‌نهایت سازمان‌های صنعت تلکام با بهره‌گیری از معیارهای فردی شامل خلاقیت، مدیریت ابهام، نگرش، دانایی، یادگیری، ارتباطات و همچنین معیارهای شغلی ازجمله عملکرد بالا و اشتیاق و نیز معیارهای سازمانی رهبری و کمال‌جویی به شناسایی ظرفیت استعدادها پرداختند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مدیریت استعداد
شناسایی استعداد
استعداد بالقوه
ظرفیت استعداد
صنعت تلکام
تحلیل تم

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Recognition the Criteria for Identifying Talent Capacity in the Telecom Industry

نویسندگان English

davoud ebrahimi 1
Aryan Gholipour 2
Abbas Nargesian 3
1 Masters of degree, Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Government Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Government Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Competition in the industry and the scarcity of talented human resources convince managers to respond to the present and future needs of the organization by creating a talent management unit and focusing on the talent capacity of individuals along with their identification. This study aimed to identify criteria through which potentially talented people can be recognized, while responding to the needs of managers in this area. This research is exploratory in terms of nature and applied in terms of purpose. Interview was used to collect first-hand data since identifying talent in the telecom industry is more important due to the continuous and rapid growth of technology. After designing and conducting semi-structured interviews with 16 deputies, managers, supervisors and senior experts of the human resources department of companies operating in this industry by using the method suggested by Brown and Clark (2006) for theme analysis was used. After coding the initial data, the criteria for identifying talent capacity were created in three general categories of individual criteria, job criteria and organizational criteria based on ten sub-themes. Finally, Telecom industry organizations can use individual criteria including creativity, ambiguity management, attitude, knowledge, learning, communication as well as job criteria such as high performance and engagement as well as organizational criteria including leadership and perfectionism to identify talent capacity.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Talent Management
Talent identification
Potential Talent
Capacity Talent
Telecom Industry
Thematic Analysis
Khaki, GH. (2008). Research method in management. Baztab, Tehran.(in Persian)
Rajabi poor meibodi, A. & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Designing an Integrated Model of Talent Management through Thematic Analysis. Journal of Human Resource Studies (JHRS), (37), 79-104. (in Persian)
Tahmasebi, R., Gholipoor, A. & Javaherizadeh, E. (2012). Talent Management: Explain, Identify and the Rank Influencing Factors on Recruitment and Retention of Academic talent. Journal of Public Management Researches, (17), 5-26. (in Persian)
Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 147-154.
Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based ‘View’ A Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56.
Berger , L., & Berger, D. (2010). The Talent Management Handbook, Second Edition: Creating a Sustainable Competitive Advantage by Selecting, Developing, and Promoting the Best People (2 ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Church, A., Guidry, B., Dickey, J., & Scrivani, J. (2021). Is there potential in assessing for high-potential? Evaluating the relationships between performance ratings, leadership assessment data, designated high-potential status and promotion outcomes in a global organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 101516.
Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT: A REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA. Human Resource Management Review, 304-313.
Collings, D., Mellahi, K., & Cascio, W. (2018). Global Talent Management and Performance in Multinational Enterprises: A Multilevel Perspective. Journal of Management, 45(2), 540-566.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272-285.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Thunnissen, M. (2016). Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research. Employee Relations, 38, 31-56.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Thunnissen, M., & Scullion, H. (2020). Talent management: context matters. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), 457-473.
Guba, E. G., & Lincon, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Jones, J. T., Whitaker, M., Seet, P.‐S., & Parkin, J. (2012). Talent management in practice in Australia: individualistic or strategic? An exploratory study. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 399-420.
Keller, P. C. (2014). Talent Management: Conceptual Approaches and Practical Challenges. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 305-331.
King, K., & Vaiman, V. (2019). Enabling effective talent management through a macro-contingent approach: A framework for research and practice. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(3), 194-206.
Lai, Y.-L., & Ishizaka, A. (2020). The application of multi-criteria decision analysis methods into talent identification process: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Business Research, 109, 637-647.
Maker, C. (2020). Identifying Exceptional Talent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Increasing Diversity and Assessing Creative Problem-Solving. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(3), 161-210.
Mcdonnell, A., Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Schuler, R. S. (2017). Talent management: A systematic review and future prospects. European Journal of International Management, 11, 86-128.
Meyers, M. (2020). The neglected role of talent proactivity: Integrating proactive behavior into talent-management theorizing. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2).
Meyers, M., & Woerkom, M. v. (2014). The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 49, 192-203.
Meyers, M., Woerkom, M., Paauwe, J., & Dries, N. (2020). HR managers’ talent philosophies: prevalence and relationships with perceived talent management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), 562-588.
Michaels, E., Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The War for Talent. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Parker, S. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 447-469.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662.
PwC. (2017). 2017 CEO Pulse Survey. London: Author.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartla, B., . . . Jinks, C. (2017). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893-1907.
Schiemann, W. A. (2014). From talent management to talent optimization. Journal of World Business, 281-288.
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.
Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266-274.
Tyskbo, D. (2019). Competing institutional logics in talent management: talent identification at the HQ and a subsidiary. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-35.
Xie, H., Cai, Y., Wong, T.-L., Zou, D., & Wang, F. (2019). A talent assessment model based on learning behaviors and patterns. 2019 International Symposium on Educational Technology (pp. 3-6). Hradec Kralove: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of creative talents’ organisational culture consent on job satisfaction. South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1).
doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2214
پژوهش های مدیریت منابع سازمانی
دوره 12، شماره 3
دی 1401
صفحه 7-32