فهم ساختار اساسی پدیده رسالت حرفه‌ای از منظر کارکنان یک سازمان مردم‌نهاد: کاربرد رویکرد پدیدارشناسی توصیفی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسنده
الهام ابراهیمی
استادیار مدیریت منابع انسانی، گروه مدیریت، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
هدف: رسالت حرفه‌ای مفهومی است که در یک دهه اخیر توجه پژوهشگران حوزه‌های مختلف تخصصی را به خود معطوف کرده است. به‌رغم این موضوع، تنوع و تکثر تعاریف ارائه شده و صورتبندی‌های مختلف این پدیده سبب شده اجماع چندانی در مورد ماهیت و ابعاد تشکیل‌دهنده آن وجود نداشته باشد. از اینرو، پژوهش حاضر با هدف فهم ساختار اساسی پدیده رسالت حرفه‌ای، از منظر کارکنان شاغل در یکی از سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد انجام شد تا به درک عمیق‌تر این مفهوم کمک کند.

روش: از آنجا که هدف، یافتن ساختار اساسی پدیده رسالت حرفه‌ای، و نه شرح تجربه انفرادی افراد بود، پژوهش با رویکرد کیفیِ پدیدارشناسی توصیفی و با روش چهار مرحله‌ای گئورگی طرح‌ریزی و انجام شد. برای گردآوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه‌های روایتی با هشت نفر از کارکنان موسسه محک به‌عنوان یک موسسه مردم‌نهاد شناخته شده در کشور انجام شد. برای تأیید قابلیت اعتمادِ تحلیل‌ها از دو روش بازآوایی و بازتاب‌پذیری که ازجمله روش‌های ارزیابی پژوهش‌های پدیدار‌شناختی هستند، استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: پس از تعیین واحدهای معنا و تبدیلات حاصل از ترکیب، ادغام و انتزاع آن‌ها، رسالت حرفه‌ای به مثابه نوعی فراخواندن متعالی و گرانیگاه ساحات زندگی تعریف شد. به‌علاوه، اجزای کلیدیِ معنای پدیده و روابط میان آن‌ها نشان داد، این مفهوم سرشتی دوگانه دارد؛ سویه‌ مثبت که ابعاد انگیزه‌بخش درونزا و سویه‌ منفی که ابعاد آزارنده برونزا هستند. درنهایت، اجزای کلیدی ساختار اساسی پدیده رسالت حرفه‌ای بر اساس توصیف هر جزء تحلیل شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
رسالت حرفه‌ای
سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد
پدیدارشناسی توصیفی

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Understanding the main construct of calling phenomenon from the perspective of an NGO's staff: Applying A descriptive phenomenological approach

نویسنده English

Elham Ebrahimi
Assistant professor, Department of management, Institute for humanities and cultural studies, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Purpose: Calling is a concept that has attracted the attention of researchers in various fields in the last decade. Despite that, the variety and multiplicity of definitions provided and the different formulations of this phenomenon have led to a lack of consensus on the nature and dimensions of its construct. Therefore, the present study aimed to understand the construct of calling from the perspective of employees working in a non-governmental organization to help better understand this concept.

Methodology: Since the aim was to find the structure of calling, and not to describe the experience of individuals, the research was designed and conducted with a qualitative approach of descriptive phenomenology and with the four-step Giorgi method. To collect the data, narrative interviews were conducted with eight employees of Mahak Institute, a well-known non-governmental organization in the country. To confirm the reliability of the analyzes, two methods of resonancy and reflectivity were used, which are among the evaluation methods of phenomenological research.

Results: After determining units of meaning and transformations resulting from their combination, integration and abstraction, calling was defined as a kind of transcendental muster and the center and gravity of life. In addition, the key constituents of the meaning of the phenomenon and the relationships between them showed that this concept has a double-edged nature; The positive side are the endogenous motivating dimensions and the negative side are the annoying exogenous dimensions. Finally, key constituents of the calling construct and their meaning units were analyzed based on the description of each constituent.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Calling
Non-Governmental Organizations
Phenomenology
Giorgi
[1] Berg, J. M., Grant, A. M., Johnson, V. When callings are calling: “crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings”. Organization Science, 21(5), (2010): 973- 994.
[2] Ahn, J., Dik, B. J., Hornback, R. “The experience of career change driven by a sense of calling: An interpretative phenomenological analysis approach”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, (2017): 48-62.
[3] Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D. “Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice”. The counseling psychologist, 37 (3), (2009): 424-450.
[4] Elangovan, A. R., Pinder, C. C., McLean, M. “Callings and organizational behavior”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, (2010): 428-440.
[5] Hall, D. T., Chandler, D. E. “Psychological success: When the career is a calling”. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26 (2), (2005): 155-176.
[6] Hirschi, A. “Callings in career: A typological approach to essential and optional components”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (1), (2011): 60-73
[7] Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R. P. “Living a calling and work well-being: a longitudinal study”. Journal of counseling psychology, 61 (4), (2014): 605.
[8] Li. H. Yang. X. “When a calling is living Job crafting mediates the relationships between living a calling and work engagement”. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 9(2), (2018): 77-106.
[9] Bunderson, J. Thompson, J. “The call of the wild: zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), (2009): 32-57.
[10] Duffy, R.D. Dik. B.J. “Research on calling: What have we learned and where are we going?”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), (2013): 428–436.
[11] Dobrow, S. R., Tosti‐Kharas, J. “Calling: The development of a scale measure”. Personnel psychology, 64(4), (2011): 1001-1049.
[12] Duffy, R. D., Bott, E. M., Allan, B. A., Torrey, C. L., Dik, B. J. “Perceiving a calling, living a calling, and job satisfaction: testing a moderated, multiple mediator model”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), (2012): 50.
[13] Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., Wrzesniewski, A. “On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, (2010): 91–127.
[14] Ebrahimi, E. “The Relationship between Living a Calling and Job Crafting: The Moderating Role of Job Passion”. Transformation Management Journal, 12(2), (2021): 1-20. (In Persian)
[15] Kang, H. J. A., Cain, L., Busser, J. A. “The impact of living a calling on job outcomes”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, (2021): 102916.
[16] Duffy, R. D., Autin, K. L., England, J. W., Douglass, R. P., Gensmer, N. P. “Examining the effects of contextual variables on living a calling over time”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, (2018): 141-152.
[17] Douglass, R. P., Duffy, R. D., Autin, K. L. “Living a calling, nationality, and life satisfaction: A moderated, multiple mediator model”. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(2), (2016): 253-269.
[18] Ehrhardt, K., Ensher, E. “Perceiving a calling, living a calling, and calling outcomes: How mentoring matters”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(2), (2021): 168-181.
[19] Cain, L., Moreo, A., Rahman, I. “Callings and Satisfaction among Hospitality Students: The Mediation of Thriving and Moderation of Living a Calling”. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(2), (2021): 89-98.
[20] Brown, S.D. Lent, R.W. “Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work”, (2020): NY: John Wiley & Sons.
[21] Conklin, T. A. “Work worth doing: A phenomenological study of the experience of discovering and following one’s calling”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(3), (2012): 298-317.
[22] Karen A. Longman, Jolyn Dahlvig, Richard J. Wikkerink, Debra Cunningham, Candy M. “O’Connor Conceptualization of Calling: A Grounded Theory Exploration of CCCU Women Leaders”. Christian Higher Education, 10(3-4), (2011): 254-275.
[23] Thompson, J. Bunderson, J. “Research on work as a calling… and how to make it matter”. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, (2019): 421-443.
[24] Giorgi, A. “The descriptive phenomenological method in Psychology: A modified Husserlian Approach”. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (2009).
[25] Flick, U. “Doing Grounded Theory”. Sage Publications. (2018)
[26] Curtin, M., Fossey, E. “Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists”. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), (2007): 88–94.
[27] Beck, C. T. “Introduction to phenomenology: Focus on methodology”. SAGE Publications. (2020).
[28] Duffy, R. D., Dik, B. J., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., Velez, B. L. “Work as a calling: A theoretical model”. Journal of counseling psychology, 65(4), (2018): 423-439.
[29] Giorgi, A. “The descriptive phenomenological psychological method”. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, (2012): 3–12.
[30] Cain, L., Busser, J. and Kang, H.J. “Executive chefs’ calling: effect on engagement, work-life balance and life satisfaction”. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(5), (2018): 2287-2307.
[31] Shin, J. Y., Kim, E., Ahn, J. “A Latent Profile Analysis of Living a Calling, Burnout, Exploitation, and Work–Life Imbalance”. Journal of Career Development, In Press. (2021).
[32] Zhang, C., Dik, B. J., Dong, Z. “Living a Calling and Work–Family Interface: A Latent Profile Analysis”. Journal of Career Assessment, In Press. (2021).
[33] Schabram, K., Maitlis, S. “Negotiating the challenges of a calling: Emotion and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work”. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), (2017): 584-609.
پژوهش های مدیریت منابع سازمانی
دوره 12، شماره 2
مهر 1401
صفحه 11-29