توسعه ظرفیت اصلاح نظام اداری در پرتو سازمان هوشمند با رویکرد داده‌بنیاد

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی کیفی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
3 استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
4 استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
5 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز
چکیده
یکی از محورهای نقشه راه اصلاح نظام اداری ایران و سیاست‌های کلان اداری، موضوع توسعه دولت الکترونیک و هوشمند‌سازی اداری در راستای تسهیل خدمت‌رسانی به مردم است. در همین راستا هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدلی جامع برای معرفی سازمان هوشمند است. این پژوهش در چارچوب رویکرد کیفی و به‌روش داده‌بنیـاد انجـام شد. نخست با انتخاب 17 نفر از اعضای هیأت ‌علمی و کارشناسان حوزه سازمان و مدیریت به‌روش نمونه‌گیری نظری، مصاحبه‌های عمیق و نیمه‌ساختار یافته‌ای انجام شد و داده‌های حاصل از آنها در سـه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تجزیه‌ و تحلیل شدند و 230 کد اولیه استخراج و 72 مفهوم و 17 مقوله احصا گردید. به‌‌منظور اعتبارسنجی مدل، از روش دلفی استفاده شد و به‌روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی و باتوجه‌به سوابق تحصیلی، پژوهشی یا اجرایی در حوزه سازمان و مدیریت 31 نفر به‌‌عنوان اعضای پانل خبرگان انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه‌ تنظیم‌ شده بر‌اساس مؤلفه‌های مدل در اختیار ایشان قرار گرفت. بر‌اساس نتایج حاصل از روش دلفی، میزان شاخص‌ اجماع در دورههای سه‌گانه افزایش پیدا کرد، به‌این‌‌ترتیب ‌که مقدار ضریب هماهنگی کندال در دور سوم بالاتر از 7/0 بود که نشان‌ از اجماع قوی در بین خبرگان در خصوص مؤلفه‌های مدل داشت. به‌این‌ترتیب مدل سازمان هوشمند با دو عامل علّی درون و برونسازمانی، عوامل زمینه‌ایِ فناوری اطلاعات، مدیریت هوشمند، مدیریت دانش، سرمایه انسانی، تجهیزات و زیرساخت‌ها، ساختار سازمانی و سازمان یادگیرنده، عوامل مداخله‌گرِ فرهنگ توسعه‌گرا، اعتماد، تعهد و عدالت سازمانی، راهبردهای حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات و مدیریت دانش و پیامدهای درونسازمانی و برونسازمانی شکل گرفت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Developming AdministrativeSystem Reform Capability Considering Smart Organization based on Grounded Theory Approach

نویسندگان English

Najme Mehdibeigi 1
Amin Reza Kamalian 2
Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi 3
Ali Asghar Pourezzat 4
Mohammad Hossein Ronaghi 5
1 Ph.D Candidate of Management – HRM, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan & Blouchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
2 Associate Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan & Blouchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
3 Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan & Blouchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
4 Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
5 Assistant professor, Department of management, college of economics, management and social sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده English

One of the pillars of Iran administrative system reform roadmap and macro-administrative policies is development of e-government and administrative intelligence to facilitate service delivery to the public. So, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive model for introducing Smart Organization. It is conducted by qualitative approach framework using grounded theory method. To this end, 17 faculty members and experts in field of organization and management were selected using theoretical sampling method and in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data were analysed in three stages of open, axial and selective coding. Thus 230 initial codes, 72 concepts and 17 categories were extracted. Then, the Delphi method was used to validate the model and 31 people were selected by snowball sampling based on their academic, research or executive in organization and management. A questionnaire based on model components was provided to them. The consensus index increased in the three rounds, so that the Kendall coefficient in the third round was higher than 0.7, indicating a strong consensus among the experts on the model components. Data analysis showed that inside and outside of the organization factors are causal factors; information technology, intelligent management, knowledge management, human capital, equipment and infrastructure, organizational structure and learning organization are contextual factors; developmental culture, trust, commitment, and organizational justice are interfering factors; Information technology governance and knowledge management are strategies for smart organization that have inside and outside of the organizational consequences.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Smart Organiation
Administrative System Reform
Grounded Theory
[1] Elyasi, M.; Safardoust, A.; Rozehsara, M. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Innovating Strategy on Innovative Performance of Organizations (Case study: Knowledge-based Companies of Biotechnology Area). Strategic Management Thought, 12(1): 183-202.
[2] Gotcheva, N.; Watts, G.; Oedewald, P. (2011). Developing smart and safe organizations: an evolutionary approach. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(1): 83-97.
[3] Petković, M.; Lukić, J. (2013). The Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Design: Example in Healthcare Organization. Sociological, 55 (3): 439-460.
[4] Lazarevic, S.; Lukic, J. (2015). Building Smart Organization through Learning and Development of Employees. Faculty of Business economics and Entrepreneurship, Chicago, United States of America.
[5] Tabarsa, Gh.; Nazarpoori, A. (2013) The Survey of Factor Affecting Human-structural Intelligence in Knowledge Based Organizations. Management Research in Iran 17(1): 111-131.
[6] El Haiba, M.; Elbassiti, L.; Ajhoun. R. (2017). Smart Organization: Improving Innovation Performance through Recommendation. 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference -IBIMA-, Madrid, Spain.
[7] Faghihi, A.; Kazemi Bigdeli, S.A. (2014). A model for designing and implementing administrative reform plans In Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian journal of management sciences, 9(34): 1-24.
[8] Hajipur, B.; azizi, S.; gharehgheh, M.; Mohammadi, M. (2017). A Fundamental Model of Effective Marketing Resource Allocation: Grounded Theory Approach. Organizational Resources Management Researches, 7(3): 59-74.
[9] Danaee Fard, H.; HRahmanseresht, H.; Mazloomi, N.; Khalil Nezhad, Sh. (2013). Basic Decision-making Pattern of Iranian Sport Management: Strategy Discourse Exploration using Grounded Analysis. Organizational Resources Management Researchs, 3(1): 23-44.
[10] Homayooni Rad, M.; Legziyan, M.; Farahi, M.; Kazemi, M. (2018). The pattern of enjoying the Internet In the staff of Government organization (Case Study: Governmental Organizations of Mashhad). Iranian journal of management sciences, 13(49): 77-110.
[11] Mehrara, A.; Azami Saroklaei, S.; Sadeghi, M.; Fatthi, A. (2012). Relation between organizational intelligence and creativity of managers inpublic junior high schools of east of Gilan province. Journal of Basic andApplied Scientific Research, 2(4): 3311-3315.
[12] Najjari, R.; azar, A.; Ahmady, F.; Jalilian, H. (2015). Providing a Framework for Intelligent Organization in Manufacturing Companies. Organizational Resources Management researches, 5(2) :139-173
[13] Staskeviciute, I.; Neverauskas B. (2008). The Intelligent University’s Conceptual Model. Journal of Engineering Economics, 4(59): 53-58.
[14] Gil-Garcia, J. R.; Helbig, N.; Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31: 11-18.
[15] Nisar, T.M.; Prabhakar, G.; Strakova, L. (2019). Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations. Journal of Business Research, 94: 264-272.
[16] Sarlak, M. (2012). The Emerging Face of Organization in the 21st Century: The Management Reference Book. Tehran: Marja Danesh Publication.
[17] Tabarsa, Gh.; Rezaeian. A.; Nazarpouri, A. (2012). Designing and Describing the Model of Competitive Advantage based on Organizational Intelligence in Knowledge-Based Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(1): 47-72.
[18] Moghaddam, A.; Mehmannavazan, S. (2017). Investigating the Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Innovation with the Mediation Role of Organizational Intelligence (Case Study: Semnan University). Journal of Human Resources Studies, 5(20): 145-146.
[19] Veryard, R. (2012). Organizational Intelligence. Leanpub, chapter 1, pp 12-18.
[20] Potas, N.; Ercetin, S. Sule; Kocak S. (2010). Multi-dimensional organizational intelligence measurements for determining the institutional and managerial capacity of girl's technical education institution for girls. African Journal of Business Management, 4 (8): 1644-1651.
[21] Taghva, M.; TaghaviFard, M.; Moeini, A.; Zynoddini, M. (2017). A Smart Government Model: Dimensions of Smart Government Using Meta-Synthesis Method. Quarterly Journal of BI Management Studies 6(1): 131-168.
[22] Mardani, M.; Mansouri, E. (2016). Identification of Key Indicators of Intelligent State Sovereignty Institutions (Case Study: Ministry of Interior). Quarterly Journal of Social Development, 10(4): 171-196.
[23] Najjari, R.; Azar, A.; Jalilian, H. (2015). Developing an Intelligent Organization Model in Manufacturing Companies. Organizational Behavior studies quarterly, 4(1): 1-24.
[24] Rezaeian, A.; Mahmoodian, M.; Nasrabadi, H. (2011). Investigating, Comparing, and Ranking the Intelligence Factors of Knowledge-Based Organizations. Journal of Quantitative Studies in Management, 2(1): 1-16.
[25] Pourezzat. A.; Attar Taheri, Gh. (2006). Toward intelligent governance. Organizational Culture Management. 4(3): 131-150.
[26] Pazireh, T.; Rahimi, Gh; Nejad Irani, F.; Bohlouli, N. (2019). Model Development for establishment of smart organization: case study of the social security organization. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 10(4): 559-565.
[27] Albrecht‚ K. (2003). Organizational intelligence survey. Australian Institute of Management, 5(19): 78-81.
[28] Charmaz, K. (2017). Special Invited Paper: Continuities, Contradictions, and Critical Inquiry in Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16: 1–8.
[29] Nouri. A.; Danaeefard, H.; A Khaef-Elahi, A.; Forouzandeh, L. (2017). The Exploration of Organizational Pride: Designing and Validating Measure. Journal of Public Management Researches, 10(35): 35-59.
[30] Sepahvand, R.; Shariatnezhad, A.; Saedi, A. (2017). Design Architectural Model of Human Capital in Governmental Agencies Using Grounded Theory. Journal Management System, 12(44): 173-198.
[31] Charmaz, K., (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
[32] Wiesner, R.; Chadee, D.; Best, P. (2017). Managing Change toward Environmental Sustainability: A Conceptual Model in Small and Medium Enterprises. Organization & Environment, 31(2): 152–177.
[33] Banejad, B.; Tabatabaii Nasab, S.M.; Sadeghi, H. (2019). Revising the concept of the marketing mix in Iranian bank industry: The application of Glazerian grounded theory approach. Iranian journal of management sciences, 13(50): 54-80.
[34] Danaeifard, H.; Emami, S.M. (2007). Strategies of Qualitative Research: A Reflection on Grounded Theory. Strategic Management Thought, 1(2): 69-97.
[35] Lee, M. (2015). Constructing the nation through negotiating: An outcome of using grounded theory. Public Relations Review (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.011.
[36] Strauss, A. L.; Corbin, J. M (2013). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Processes of Producing Grounded Theory. Tehran: Nay Publication.
[37] Ekhlassi, A; Shafiee, R.; Ansari, F. (2016). E-retail branding by grounded theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(2): 167-188.
[38] Strauss, A.; Corbin, Juliet M. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1): 3-21.
[39] Azari Arani, Gh.; Rezaeenour, J. (2019). The Structural Model of National Knowledge Creation Processes: An Interpretative Structural Modeling Approach. Journal of Technology of Education, 13(3): 537-552.
[40] Dehghani, M; Yaghoubi N.M; Mooghali, A; Vazife, Z. (2019). A Comprehensive model of factors affecting Establishment of Knowledge Management. A New Approach to Education, 10(37): 109-132.