فرایندکاوی نخبه‌ستیزی در سازمان بر اساس طرح نگاشت تفسیری نظریه داده‌بنیاد

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی کیفی

نویسندگان
فهیمه علیزاده 1
مصطفی هادوی نژاد 2
1 گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج)، رفسنجان، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج)، رفسنجان، ایران
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش کاوش فرآیند نخبه­ ستیزی در یکی از سازمان­های دولتی مبتنی بر طرح نگاشت تفسیری نظریه داده ­بنیاد بود. مشارکت‌کنندگان 32 نفر از کارکنان این سازمان بودند که با نمونه ­گیری نظریه برای مصاحبه انتخاب شدند. برای تحلیل داده­ ها و نگاشت نظریه از نرم ­افزارهای Maxqda و Decision Explorer استفاده شد. طبق یافته ­های پژوهش سرآغاز نخبه­ ستیزی در سازمان موردمطالعه وجود سه عامل حسن عملکرد نخبگان، پیش­فرض همگونی در فرهنگ سازمانی و ضعف نظام پایش عملکرد مدیران ارشد سازمان بود. نخبه­ ستیزان دو دسته حسادت­ ورز نسبت به نخبگان بودند؛ نخست، رهبر زهرآگین سازمان که به دلیل ضعف پایش عملکرد مدیریت توسط مراجع ذی­ صلاح، مدیریت ساکن در سایه را پیشه ساخته و نخبگان را رقیب می ­انگاشت. دوم، کارکنان شرنگ ­آلودی که برای نیل به منافع متقابل خود با رهبر تبانی و از او حمایت می­کردند. نخبگان متأثر از محبوبیت و حسن عملکرد خود و جو کژکارکردی سازمان به مقاومت اعتراضی مصلحانه در برابر تغییرات سازمانی دست می­زنند. این موضوع انگاره رقابت را در ذهن نخبه­ ستیزان تقویت و آنها را به رفتارهای خاموش در قبال نخبگان متمایل می­ کند. دست آخر با توجه به جو غیراخلاقی حاکم بر سازمان و نیز بی ­پشتوانگی نخبگان، نخبه­ ستیزان به اقدامات عملی سلبی علیه نخبگان روی می­ آورند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
نخبه
نخبه‌ستیزی
نظریه داده‌بنیاد
نگاشت تفسیری

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Process Mining for Anti-Elitism in an Organization based on Interpretive Mapping Design of Grounded Theory

نویسندگان English

Fahimeh Alizadeh 1
Mostafa Hadavinejad 2
1 Public administration Msc, Department of management, Faculty of Administrative sciences and economy, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of management, Faculty of Administrative sciences and economy, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran
چکیده English

The purpose of this study was exploring the process of Anti-elitism in a public organization based on interpretive mapping design of grounded theory. In this regard, 32 employees of mentioned organization selected as interviewees using theory sampling. In order to data analysis and theory mapping Maxqda and Decision Explorer were used. Based on research findings the preface of anti-elitisn in organization of interest were three factors: good performance of elites, the assumption of homogeneity in organizational culture, and weakness of organization top managers’ monitoring system. Anti-elitists were two categories of jealousy against elites. First, organization toxic leader who was fallowed shadow-stagnant management style and antagonistic approach against elites in the shadow of weakness in monitoring management performance from legal authorities. Second, toxic employees as colluders and shield of leader in line of their mutual interests. Backing of their good performance and popularity, elites resisted to changes as reformist protestors against dysfunctional climate of organization. So, the anti-elitists’ antagonistic approach invigorated and they tended to silent treatments against elites. Finally, due to the immoral climate of organization and elites’ lack of support, anti-elitists turned to privative actions against elites.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Elite
Anti-Elitism
Grounded Theory
Interpretive Mapping
[1]. Byham, W. C., Smith, A. B., Paese, M. J.; Grow your own leaders: How to identify, develop, and retain leadership talent; Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, 2002.
[2]. Seyyedjavadeyn, S. R., Pahlavansharif, M. A.; "Pathology of elite absorption and maintenance plan: Case study at national iranian oil company"; Management and Human Resources in the Oil Industry, Vol. 4, 2011, pp. 7-39. (in Persian)
[3]. Vecchio, R. P.; "Negative emotions in the workplace: Employee jealousy and envy"; International Journal of Stress Management, Vol. 7, 2000, pp. 161-79.
[4]. Robinson, S. L., O’Reilly, J., Wang, W.; "Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism"; Journal of Management, Vol. 39, 2013, pp. 203-31.
[5]. Feldman, D. C., Weitz, B. A.; "Career plateaus reconsidered"; Journal of Management, Vol. 14, 1988, pp. 69-80.
[6]. Lein, D., Wang, Y.; "Brain drain or brain gain: A revisit"; Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 18, 2005, pp. 153-63.
[7]. Yazdaninasab, M.; "Critical review of the theory of elits in social sciences and its re-conceptualization with emphasis on structure"; Iranian Sociological Association, Vol. 16, 2016, pp. 93-113. (in Persian)
[8]. Estlund, D.; "Why not epistocracy?"; In: N. Reshotko (Ed.), Desire, identity, and existence: Essays in honor of T. M. Penner, Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing & Publishing, 2003, pp. 53-69.
[9]. Min, J. B.; "Epistocracy and democratic epistemology"; Politics in Central Europe, Vol. 11, 2015, pp. 91-112.
[10]. Tremmel, J., Wilhelm, J.; "Democracy or Epistocracy? Age as a Criterion of Voter Eligibility"; In: Tremmel, J., Mason, A., Godli, P. H., Dimitrijoski, I. (Eds.), Youth quotas and other efficient forms of youth participation in ageing societies. Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 125–48.
[11]. Rothwell, W. J.; "Replacement planning: A starting point for succession planning and talent management"; International Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 15, 2011, pp. 87-99.
[12]. Rezaqoli, A; The sociology of killing elits; Tehran: Ney Publication, 1998. (in Persian)
[13]. O’Neill, M., Calder, A., Allen, B. "Tall poppies: Bullying behaviors faced by Australian high-performance school-age athletes"; Journal of School Violence, Vol. 13, 2014, pp. 210–27.
[14]. Özkoç, A. G., Çalışkan, N. "The impact of organisational envy on organisational climate created among employees: An application in accommodation enterprises"; International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 10, 2015, pp. 40-9.
[15]. Hadavinejad, M., Kalvandi, M.; "Exploring dynamics of toxic leadership’s antecedents using interpretive structural modeling"; Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, Vol. 5, 2016, pp. 1-24. (in Persian)
[16]. Padilla, A., Hogan, R., Kaiser, R. B. "The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments"; The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, 2007, pp. 176-94.
[17]. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., Ferris, G. R.; "A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future"; Journal of Management, Vol. 38, 2012, pp. 1715-59.
[18]. Morgan, G. Images of organization, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.
[19]. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., Harrison, D. A.; "Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing"; Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97, 2005, pp. 117-134.
[20]. Hadavinejad, M., Danaeifard, H., Azar, A., Khaef elahi, A.; "Exploring the process of hypocritical behaviors in interpersonal communication in the workplace using grounded theory"; Strategic Management Thought, Vol. 4, 2010, pp. 81-130. (in Persian)
[21]. Danaeifard, H., Alvani, S. M.; "Metaphorical reasoning strategy in building theory: A new theory of administrative system"; Management Research in Iran, Vol. 11, 2007, pp. 107-35. (in Persian)
[22]. Burke, R. J., Mikkelsen, A.; "Examining the career plateau among police officers"; International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, Vol. 29, 2006, pp. 691-703.
[23]. Feldman, D. C., Weitz, B. A. "Career plateaus reconsidered"; Journal of Management, Vol. 14, 1988, pp. 69-80.
[24]. McAuley, J., Duberley, J., Johnson, P.; Organization theory: Challenges and perspectives; UK: Prentice Hall, 2007.
[25]. Burke, R. J. "Why leaders fail: exploring the darkside"; International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 27, 2006, pp. 91-100.
[26]. Creswell, J. W.; Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research; Boston: Pearson Education Inc., 2012.
[27]. Ackermann F., Eden C.; "Strategic options development and analysis"; In: Reynolds M., Holwell, S. (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing Change: A practical guide. London: Springer, 2010, pp.135-90.
پژوهش های مدیریت منابع سازمانی
دوره 9، شماره 1
مهر 1398
صفحه 165-183