طراحی الگوی ساختاری هشیاری سازمانی: پژوهشی آمیخته

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش با هدف طراحی الگوی ساختاری هشیاری سازمانی، یک پژوهش آمیخته، اکتشافی متوالی، و کاربردی می‌باشد. جامعه بخش کیفی، خبرگان هیأت علمی دانشکده‌های مدیریت دانشگاه‌های دولتی تهران، نمونه 14 خبره علم مدیریت با نمونه‌گیری گلوله‌برفی معین و اجرا با مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختار یافته بود. جامعه بخش کمّی، اعضای هیأت علمی گروه‌های مدیریت دانشکده‌های مدیریت دانشگاه‌های دولتی تهران (351 عضو)، نمونه 226 عضو هیأت علمی با نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای دومرحله‌ای به صورت در دسترس و اجرا با ابزار محقق‌ساخته هشیاری سازمانی و ابزارهای استاندارد رهبری تحولی و جامعه یادگیرنده حرفه‌ای در 94-1393 بود. روایی و پایایی ابزارهای پژوهش مطلوب بود. برای تحلیل متون جهت تدوین شاخص‌های هشیاری در بخش کیفی، از کدگذاری باز استفاده شد. روش‌های تحلیل آماری کمّی، تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی و الگویابی معادلات ساختاری بود. الگویابی معادلات ساختاری شامل یک سازه نهفته برونزای رهبری تحولی و دو سازه نهفته درونزای جامعه یادگیرنده حرفه‌ای و هشیاری سازمانی است. یافته‌ها حاکی از تأثیر معنادار و مستقیم رهبری تحولی بر جامعه یادگیرنده حرفه‌ای بر هشیاری سازمانی و تأثیر معنادار و مستقیم جامعه یادگیرنده حرفه‌ای بر هشیاری سازمانی است. نتایج بیانگر تأثیر مستقیم رهبری تحولی با مضامین تأثیر ایده‌آل رفتاری و اسنادی، انگیزش الهام‌بخش، و ملاحظه فردی بر جامعه یادگیرنده حرفه‌ای با مضامین مسئولیت‌پذیری جمعی برای یادگیری، مشارکت با تمرکز بر یادگیری حرفه‌ای و بر هشیاری سازمانی با مفاهیم سرعت عمل و چابکی، انعطاف‌پذیری، پاسخگویی، یادگیری مشروط و توسعه شناخت، اعتماد و گشاده‌رویی، نیز تأثیر مستقیم جامعه یادگیرنده حرفه‌ای در شکل‌گیری هشیاری سازمانی می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Designing a Structural Model for Organizational Mindfulness: A Mixed Research

نویسندگان English

asam oahlavan 1
bijan abdolahi 2
چکیده English

The objective of study was designing a structural model for organizational mindfulness: A mixed research. This study was an explanatory sequential design and ​​an applied research. In qualitative part, population were experts of management schools of public universities of Tehran, and sample were 14. In quantitative part, population were the management faculty members of management schools of public universities of Tehran (351 members), sample were 226 using two-stage cluster sampling and targeted available were implemented. Organizational mindfulness, professional learning community and transformational leadership questionnaires were distributed and gathered in 2014-2015. Analyses showed accepted reliability and validity. In qualitative part for collecting mindfulness indicators, content analysis and open coding were used. The quantitative statistical methods were exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The structural equation modeling contained one exogenous construct of transformational leadership; two endogenous constructs of professional learning community and organizational mindfulness. Results demonstrated transformational leadership had significant and direct effects on professional learning community and on organizational mindfulness. There is direct and significant effect of professional learning community on organizational mindfulness. Results also showed transformational leadership (idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration) had direct effect on professional learning community (collective responsibility for learning, collaboration focused on professional learning). Transformational leadership also has direct and meaningful effect on organizational mindfulness (rapidity and agility, flexibility, accountability, conditional learning and development of recognition, trust and openness). Also professional learning community has direct effect on creation of organizational mindfulness.



کلیدواژه‌ها English

Organizational Mindfulness
professional learning community
Transformational Leadership
Mixed Research
Higher Education
[1]رابینز، اس، پی، مبانی رفتار سازمانی، مترجم پارسائیان و اعرابی، تهران، دفتر پژوهش­های فرهنگی، 1394.
[2] Langer E. (2005) "Well-being, mindfulness versus positive evaluation", In S. Wright & SH. Lopez (Eds.), The Handbook of Positive Psychology, pp.214-230.
[3] Ritchhart R., Perkins D. N. (2000) "Life in the mindful classroom: Nurturing the disposition of mindfulness", Journal of Social Issues, 56(1): 27-47.
[4] Garno Reid E. (2009) A mindfulness workbook for young children: A classroom feasibility trial”, A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of PhilosIophy, School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University, Copyright by ProQuest LLC.
[5] Sherretz Ch. E. (2011) "Mindfulness in education: Case studies of mindful teachers and their teaching practices", Journal of Thought, Fall-Winter, 46(3/4): 79-104.
[6] Langer E. J. (1992) "Theoretical focus, matters of mind: mindfulness in perspective", Consciousness and Cognition, 1(3): 289-305.
[7] Kearney W. S., Kelsey C., Herrington D. (2013) "Mindful leaders in highly effective schools: A mixed-method application of Hoy's M-scale", Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3): 316 -335.
 
[8] Hede A. (2010) "The dynamics of mindfulness in managing emotions and stress", Journal of Management Development, 29(1): 94-110.
[9] Bryant B., Wildi J. (2008) "Perspectives for managers. IMD International. Real world, real learning", www.imd.org.
[10] Langer E. J. (1989b) "Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, pp. 137-173.
[11] Langer E. J., Moldoveanu M. (2000) "The construct of mindfulness", Journal of Social Issues, 56(1): 1-9.
[12] Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. (1999) "Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness source: R.S. Sutton and B.M. Staw (Eds)", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1 (Stanford: Jai Press, 1999), pp. 81-123. In Crisis ManagementVOLUME III Edited by Arjen Boin (2008). SAGE Publications Ltd.
[13] Ndubisi N. O. (2012) "Mindfulness, reliability, pre-emptive conflict handling, customer orientation and outcomes in Malaysia's healthcare sector", Journal of Business Research, 65(4): 537-546.
[14] Hoy W. K. (2003) "An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures", Journal of Educational Administration,41(1): 87 -108.
[15] Hoy W. K., Gage Ch. Q., Tarter C. J. (2006) "School mindfulness and faculty trust: Necessary conditions for each other?", Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2): 236-255.
[16] Gebauer, A. (2014). Mindful organizing as a paradigm to develop managers. Journal of Management Education, 37(2), 203-228.
[17] Stoll L., Louis K. S. (2007) Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas, Open University Press.
[18] Stoll L., Bolam R., McMahon A., Wallace M., Thomas S. (2006) “Professional learning communities: A review of the literature”, Journal of Educational Change, 7(4): 221-258.
[19] Lee Chu P. W. (2008) Using mixed methods to identify high reliability organization measures for local health department disaster preparedness, A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Health in Public Health in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley.
[20] Jordan S., Messner M., Becker A. (2009) "Reflection and mindfulness in organizations: Rationales and possibilities for integration", Management Learning, 40(4): 465-473.
[21] Lind, V.R. (2015). Into the deep: Mindful music learning. General Music Today,27(2), 18-21.
[22] Carroll M. (2009) "From mindless to mindful practice: on learning reflection in supervision", Psychotherapy in Australia, 15(4): 40- 51.
[23] Kelloway K. E., Barling J., Helleur J. (2000) "Enhancing transformational leadership: the roles of training and feedback", Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21(3): 145-149.
[24] Thoonen E. J., Sleegers P. J. C., Oort F. J., Peetsma T. D., Geijsel F. P. (2011) "How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices",Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3): 496-538.
[25] Marks H. M., Printy S. M. (2003) "Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership", Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 (3): 370-397.
[26] Thompson S. C., Gregg L., Niska J. M. (2004) "Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning", Research in Middle Level Education Online, 28(1): 231-260.
[27] Geijsel F. P., Sleegers P. J. C., Stoel R. D., Kru¨ger M. L. (2009) "The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools", The Elementary School Journal, 109 (4): 406-427.
[28] Wolf E., Harrington K., Clark S., Miller M. (2013) "Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6): 913-934.
[29] Coaley K. (2010) An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics, SAGE Publications Inc.
[30] Bass B. M., Avolio B. J. (2000) MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd Ed.), Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
[31] Bolam R., McMahon A., Stoll L., Thomas S., Wallace M., Greenwood A., Hawkey K., Ingram M., Atkinson A., Smith M. (2005) Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities, University of Bristol.