اولویت‌بندی استراتژی‌های توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان با رویکرد ترکیبی از تکنیک‌های ANP و دیمتل تجدید نظر شده

نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
2 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تولید و عملیات، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تولید و عملیات، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
چکیده
توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان به فعالیت‌های شرکت خریدار برای بهبود عملکرد تأمین‌کننده در حوزه‌های کیفیت، هزینه، زمان سفارش تا تحویل، خدمات، قابلیت اطمینان و یا ارتقای سطح دانش تولید تأمین‌کنندگان اشاره دارد که به‌طور مثبت بر عملکرد عملیاتی و تجاری شرکت‌های خریدار تأثیر می‌گذارد. تحقیق حاضر به اولویت‌بندی استراتژی‌های توسعه‌ تأمین‌کنندگان شامل ارتقای سیستم کیفیت تأمین‌‌کنندگان، تبادل اطلاعات با تأمین‌کنندگان در حوزه‌های کیفی، بهبود فرایند تأمین‌‌کنندگان، افزایش بهره‌وری تأمین‌کنندگان و مشارکت در توسعه محصول تأمین‌کنندگان با رویکرد کارت امتیازی متوازن و تکنیک‌های فرایند تحلیل شبکه‌ای و دیمتل تجدید نظر شده پرداخته است. جامعه آماری تحقیق شرکت‌های ریخته‌گری تولید‌کننده قطعات خودرو در ایران هستند که بیش از 200 نفر نیروی انسانی دارند. یافته‌های تحقیق حاکی از آن است که چشم‌انداز مالی (5417/0) مهم‌ترین و چشم‌انداز یادگیری و رشد (0688/0) کم ‌اهمیت‌ترین بعد در بهبود عملکرد سازمان بوده و تبادل اطلاعات با تأمین‌کنندگان در حوزه‌های کیفی (30/0) و افزایش بهره‌وری تأمین‌کنندگان (11/0) به‌ترتیب مهم‌ترین و کم اهمیت‌ترین استراتژی در توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان محسوب می‌شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Prioritizing of Suppliers Development Strategies with Combined Approach of ANP and Revised DEMATEL Techniques

نویسندگان English

Mehrdad Madhoushi 1
Zeinolabedin akbarzadeh 2
kazem ravansetan 3
1 Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, University of Mazandaran.
2 Department of Industrial Management, faculty of adminstrative and economic science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Mazandaran, Iran
3 Department of Industrial Management, faculty of adminstrative and economic science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Mazandaran, Iran
چکیده English

Supplier development refers to the purchaser activities to improve supplier performance in the areas of quality, cost, time of ordering to delivery, service, reliability, and promotion of suppliers knowledge which positively affects the operational and business performance of purchaser. The present study deals with suppliers' development strategies including enhancement of suppliers’ quality improvement systems, data exchange with suppliers in the areas of quality, suppliers’ process improvement, suppliers’ productivity enhancement and contribute to the development of the suppliers’ product by the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach, Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Revised Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Revised DEMATEL) techniques. The population of the current research consists of the foundry companies having more than 200 subject as human resources in Iran which manufacture the automobile parts. The research findings have shown that financial perspective (0.5417) , learning and growth perspective (0.0688) are respectively the most important and the least important dimensions to improve organization performance. in addition , information exchange with suppliers in the areas of quality (0.30) and suppliers' productivity increasing (0.11) are respectively the most and least important strategies in suppliers' development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Suppliers development
performance
Balanced Scorecard
Analytic Network process
Revised DEMATEL
[1]     Carus S. P., Sucky E., Durst S. M. (2013) "The relationship between the perceived shares of costs and earnings in supplier development programs and supplier satisfaction", Industrial Marketing Management 42, pp. 202-210.
[2]     Sunchez-Rodriguez C. (2009) "Effect of strategic purchasing on supplier development and performance: A structural model", The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(3/4): 161–172.
[3]     Kannan V.R., Tan K.C., (2005) "Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance", Omega, 33 (2): 153–162.
[4]     Gonza´lez-Benito J., Martı´nez-Lorente A. R., Dale G. (2003) "A study of the purchasing management system with respect to total quality management", Industrial Marketing Management, 32: 443– 454.
[5]     Rezaei J., Wang J. Tavasszy L. (2015) "Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method", Expert Systems With Applications, 42 (23): 9152-9164.
[6]     Lin C., Chow W., Madu N., Kuei C. H., Yu P. P. (2005) "A structural equation model of supply chain quality management and organizational performance", International Journal of Production Economics, 96: 355-365.
[7]     Sangale B. R., Fattahi M., Ravansetan K., (2012) "Integration of TQM and SCM (SCQM) and their Effects on Organization Performance in Iran Automotive Casting Industries", International Journal of Research, Vol. 2. No. 1: 38 – 44.
[8]     Kaynak H., Hartley J.L., (2008) "A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain", Journal of Operations Management,. 26: 468–489.
[9]     Carr A. S., Kaynak H., Hartley J. L., Ross A. (2008) "Supplier dependence: Impact on supplier's participation and performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28 (9): 899–916.
[10] Kaynak H. (2003) "The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance", Journal of Operations Management, 21: 405–435.
[11] Petersen K., Handfield R., Ragatz G. (2003) "A model of supplier integration into new product development", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20: 284–299.
[12] Sroufe R., Curkovic, S., (2008) "An Examination of ISO 9000:2000 and Supply Chain Quality Assurance", Journal of Operations Management, 26: 503–520.
[13] Zu X., Robbins T., Fredendall L., (2010) "Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices", International Journal of Production Economics, 123: 86-106.
[14] Sadikoglu E., Zehir C., (2010) " Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms", International Journal of Production Economics, 127: 13-26.
[15] Yang J., Wong C.W.Y., Lai K.-H., Ntoko A.N. (2009) "The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer–supplier relationship improvement", International Journal of Production Economics, 120: 243–251.
[16] Forza C., Flippini R., (1998) "TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: a causal model", International Journal of Production Economics, 55: 1–20.
[17] Chan F. T., Chan H. K. (2010) "An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51(9-12): 1195-1207.
[18] Levary R. R. (2008) "Using the analytic hierarchy process to rank foreign suppliers based on supply risks", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(2): 535-542.
[19] Lin Y. T., Lin C. L., Yu H. C., Tzeng G. H. (2010) "A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection: A case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan", Expert Systems with Applications, 37 (7): 4796-4804.
[20] Tseng M. L., Chiang J. H., Lan L. W. (2009) "Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(1): 330-340.
[21] Hsu C. H., Wang F. K., Tzeng G. H. (2012) "The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR", Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66: 95-111.
[22] Hsu C. W., Kuo T. C., Chen S. H., Hu A. H. (2013) "Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management", Journal of Cleaner Production, 56: 164-172.
[23] Bentes A. V., Carneiro J., da Silva J. F., Kimura H. (2012) " Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP", Journal of Business Research, 65: 1790 – 1799.
[24] Choi T.Y., Eboch K., (1998) "The TQM paradox: Relationships among TQM practices, plant performance, and customer satisfaction", Journal of Operations Management, 17: 59–75.
[25] Yüksel I., Dagdeviren M., (2010) "Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm", Expert Systems with Applications, 37: 1270–1278.
[26] Bigliardi B., Bottani E. (2010) "Performance measurement in the food supply chain: a balanced scorecard approach", Facilities, Vol. 28, No. 5/6, pp. 249-260.
[27] Chia A., Goh M., Hum S.H. (2009) " Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 605-620.
[28] Kaynak H., (1997) "Total quality management and just-in-time purchasing: Their effects on performance of firms operating in the US", Garland, NewYork, NY.
[29] Nakhai Kamalabadi A., Bayat A., Ahmadi P., Ebrahimi A., Safari Kahreh M. (2008) "Presentation a new algorithm for performance measurement of supply chain by using FMADM approach", World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 582-589.
[30] Tzeng G.H., Huang J. J. (2011) Multiple Attribute decision making methods and applications, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, United States of America.
[31] Wang Y. L., Tzeng G. H. (2012) "Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods", Expert Systems with Applications, 39, pp. 5600–5615.
[32] Xia D., Chen B. (2011) "A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain", Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, pp. 4957–4966.
[33] Tzeng J.H., Chen W.H., Yu R., Shih M.L. (2010) "Fuzzy decision maps: a generalization of the DEMATEL methods", Soft Compute, Vol. 14, pp. 1141–1150.
[34] Wu H.H., Shieh J.I., Li Y., Chen H.L. (2010) "A combination of AHP and DEMATEL in evaluating the criteria of employment service outreach program personnel", Information Technology Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 569-575.
[35] Lee H. S., Tzeng G. H., Yeih W., Wang Y. J., Yang S.C. (2013) "Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the Infeasibility of DEMATEL", Applied Mathematical Modeling, Vol. 37, pp: 6746–6757.