[1] امیری، مجتبی؛ فرهنگی، علی‌اکبر؛ پورعزّت، علی‌اصغر؛ و غلامپور راد، منصور (1391): شناسایی یک خط پیرنگ جدید در روایتهای خط‌مشی عمومی با استفاده از چهارچوب روایتی خط‌مشی بهمنظور پیشبینی تغییرات خط‌مشی عمومی در ایران. مجله مدیریت دولتی، دوره 4، شماره 3، صص 31-54.
[2] دانائی‌فرد، حسن؛ خیرگو، منصور؛ آذر، عادل؛ فانی، علی‌اصغر (1392): فهم انتقال خط‌مشی اصلاحات اداری در ایران: پژوهشی بر مبنای راهبرد داده‌بنیاد. مجلّه مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی، دوره 10، شماره 2، صص 5-28.
[3] شهائی، بهنام؛ دانائی‌فرد، حسن؛ آذر، عادل؛ و فروزنده، لطف‌ا... (1395): تبیین ثبات و تغییر خط‌مشی یارانه‌ای ایران: چهارچوب ائتلاف مدافع. مجلّه مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، در دست انتشار.
[4] عباسی، طیبه و دانائی‌فرد، حسن(1393): چهارچوب ائتلاف مدافع و تبیین تغییر خط‌مشی. فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری، سال 6، شماره 3، صص 1-33.
[5] عباسی، طیبه؛ دانائی‌فرد، حسن؛ آذر، عادل؛ و الوانی، مهدی (1388): تبیین تغییر خط‌مشی با استفاده از نظریۀ جریانات چندگانۀ کینگدون: مطالعه موردی تغییر قانون اهداف، وظایف و تشکیلات وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری. فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری، سال 3، شماره 1، صص 81-97.
[6] Allison, G. T. (1971): Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis, New York, NY: Norton.
[7] Anderson, J. E. (1994): Public policymaking: An introduction. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin Company, pp.1-34.
[8] Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1993): Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[9] Berry, F. and Berry. W. (2014): Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. InTheories of the Policy Process, Edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 307–359. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[10] Brewer, G. D. (1974): The policy sciences emerge: To nurture and structure a discipline, Policy Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 239-244.
[11] Cairney, P, and Heikkila, T. (2014): A comparison of theories of the policy process, In Theories of the Policy Process, Eedited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M.Weible, 363–389. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[12] Cairney, P. (2013): Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine theInsights of multiple theories in public policy studies?, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 41, No.1, pp.1-21.
[13] Cohen, M. D, March, J. G, and Olsen, J. P. (1972): A garbage can model of organizational choice, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.1-25.
[14] Ellison, B.A. and Newmark, A.J. (2010): Building the reservoir to nowhere: The role of agencies in advocacy coalitions, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 38, No 4, pp. 653-678.
[15] Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (1993): The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.
[16] Gupta, K. (2012): Comparative public policy: Using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 40, No. S1, pp. 11-26.
[17] Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., and Perl, A. (2009): Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems, New York, Oxford University Press.
[18] Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., and deLeon, P. (2007): Social construction and policy design, In Theories of the Policy Process, Edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 93–128, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.
[19] Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and Sabatier, P. A. (1994): Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework, Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 14, pp. 175-203.
[20] Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., and Weible, C. M. (2014): Advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research, In Theories of the Policy Process, Edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible,.3rd ed. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, pp. 184-223.
[21] John, P. (2012): Analyzing public policy, London: Routledge.
[22] Jones, M. D. and McBeth, M. K. (2010): A narrative policy framework: Clear Enough to BeWrong? Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 329–353.
[23] Kay, A. and Baker, P. (2015): What can causal process tracing offer to policy studies? A reviewof the literature, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1-21.
[24] Kingdon, J. (1984): Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
[25] Lasswell, H. D. (1951): The policy orientation, In The Policy Sciences, Edited by Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell, Ch. 1.Palo Alto, CA, Stanford University Press.
[26] McBeth, M.K, Jones, M. D., and Shanahan, E. A. (2014): The narrative policy framework, In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, pp. 225-266.
[27] McGinnis, M. D. (2011): An introduction to IAD and the language of the ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 163-177.
[28] Meier, K. J. (2009): Policy theory, policy theory everywhere, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 5-11.
[29] Mettler, S. and SoRelle, M. (2014): Policy feedback theory, In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, pp. 151-181.
[30] Nohrstedt, D. (2008): The politics of crisis policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear EnergyPolicy, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 257-278.
[31] Nowlin, M. (2011): Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 39, No.2, pp. 41-60.
[32] Ostrom, E. (2007): Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework, In Theories of the Policy Process, Edited by Paul A. Sabatier. 2nded. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 25-63.
[33] Rogers, E. M. (1962): Diffusion of innovations, New York: Free Press.
[34] Sabatier, P. A. (1991): Toward better theories of the policy process, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 147-156.
[35] Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M. (2007): Theories of the policy process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[36] Schlager, E. (2007): A Comparison of frameworks, theoriesand models of policy processes theory, In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier. 2nded. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 293–319.
[37] Schlager, E. and Weible, C. M. (2013): New theories of the policy process, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 389-559.
[38] Schlager, E. and Blomquist, W. (1996): A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 651-672.
[39] Schneider, A. L., Ingram, H., and deLeon, P. (2014): Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations,In Theories of the Policy Process, Editedby Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, pp. 105-150.
[40] Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1993): Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy, American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 334-347.
[41] Schneider, A and Sidney, M. (2009): What is next for policy design and social construction theory?, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 103-119.
[42] Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., and McBeth, M. K. (2011): Policy narratives and policy processes, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 535-561.
[43] Smith, K. B. and Larimer. C. W. (2013): The public policy theory primer, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[44] Walker. J. (1969): The diffusion of innovations among the American States, American Political Science Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 880-899.
[45] Zahariadis, N. (2013): Building better theoretical frameworks of the European :union:’s policy process, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 807-816.
[46] Zahariadis, N. (2014): Ambiguity and multiple streams, In Theories of the Policy Process, Edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 25-57.
