Volume 6, Issue 1 (2016)
ORMR 2016, 6(1): 187-209 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
ASGARI G, ebrahimi M, ramezan M. A Critique of The Denison’s Organizational Culture Model: A Meta-Analysis. ORMR 2016; 6 (1) :187-209
URL: http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-11719-en.html
URL: http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-11719-en.html
Abstract: (9921 Views)
Denison’s Organizational Culture Model (DOCS) was used widely by academics and practitioners today. However we included thepapershas published in Iranian journals that was published in several Iranian universities in a systematic review and results of a meta-analysis suggested that all cultures’ traits; involvement, Consistency, adaptability, and mission have similar measures. We found some methodological errors in the Denison and Mishra (1995) paper. First of all the correlation test wasn’t suite statistical test to compare the four traits of organizational cultures. And finally the five point Likertmeasurement in not good enough to measure the traits of organizational cultures. We should be concerned about the relation between organizational effectiveness and four traits of organizational cultures based on these methodological errors.
Article Type: scientific research |
Subject:
مدیریت رفتار سازمانی
Received: 2015/07/7 | Accepted: 2016/05/21 | Published: 2016/07/18
Received: 2015/07/7 | Accepted: 2016/05/21 | Published: 2016/07/18
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |