Volume 4, Issue 1 (2014)
ORMR 2014, 4(1): 30-52 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khaefelahi A, Ghasemi Banabari H, Shahmohammadi A. Personnel Selection Criteria in Fuzzy Environment (Rating Method Close to Ideal Solution). ORMR 2014; 4 (1) :30-52
URL: http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-6544-en.html
URL: http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-6544-en.html
1- Associated professor Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- PhD Student of Public Management, Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3- M.A., Industrial Management and Economics Faculty, Azad Islamic University Arak, Arak, Iran
2- PhD Student of Public Management, Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3- M.A., Industrial Management and Economics Faculty, Azad Islamic University Arak, Arak, Iran
Abstract: (11071 Views)
One of the human resource managements’ functions is choosing qualified personnel in accordance with activities of organization. Selecting qualified human resources enables organization to have proper function according to strategic objectives. This paper aims to identify a criteria for selecting employees using Delphi and fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method under uncertainty situation to maximum productivity. Research Method is of development-applied and data collection method is library studies and field data collection using questionnaires and interviews. Population is senior and junior managers of small and medium sized industries in industrial areas in Markazi Province and snowball method was used for sampling. Fuzzy TOPSIS method has been used for data analysis alongside with DLSM group decision-making using MS Excel and PASW Statistics softwares. Reliability of the questionnaire tested by Cronbach's alpha method and its validity determined using content validity. Results identified 15 criteria of “character, discipline, physical characteristics, ethics, literature, intrinsic motivation, lack of criminal record, systems thinking, skill, intelligence, training, experience, age, education, and appropriate referral” in same ranked order.
Article Type: Research Paper |
Subject:
-|-
Received: 2014/05/10 | Accepted: 2015/02/2 | Published: 2015/02/9
Received: 2014/05/10 | Accepted: 2015/02/2 | Published: 2015/02/9
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |